The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 07 (of 11) — Thomas Hobbes — John Shaqi
The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 07 (of 11)
Thomas Hobbes · en
_A._ If a bullet from a certain point given, be shot against a wall
perpendicularly, and again from the same point obliquely, what will be
the proportion of the forces wherewith they urge the wall? For example,
let the wall be A B, a point given E, a gun C E, that carries the bullet
perpendicularly to F, and another gun D E, that carries the like bullet
with the same swiftness obliquely to G; in what proportion will their
forces be upon the wall?
_B._ The force of the stroke perpendicular from E to F will be greater
then the oblique force from E to G, in the proportion of the line E G to
the line E F.
_A._ How can the difference be so much? Can the bullet lose so much of
its force in the way from E to G?
_B._ No; we will suppose it loseth nothing of its swiftness. But the
cause is, that their swiftness being equal, the one is longer in coming
to the wall than the other, in proportion of time, as E G to E F. For
though their swiftness be the same, considered in themselves, yet the
swiftness of their approach to the wall is greater in E F than in E G,
in proportion of the lines themselves.
_A._ When a bullet enters not, but rebounds from the wall, does it make
the same angle going off, which it did falling on, as the sun-beams do?
_B._ If you measure the angles close by the wall their difference will
not be sensible; otherwise it will be great enough, for the motion of
the bullet grows continually weaker. But it is not so with the sun-beams
which press continually and equally.
_A._ What is the cause of reflection? When a body can go no further on,
it has lost its motion. Whence then comes the motion by which it
reboundeth?
_B._ This motion of rebounding or reflecting proceedeth from the
resistance. There is a difference to be considered between the
reflection of light, and of a bullet, answerable to their different
motions, pressing and striking. For the action which makes reflection of
light, is the pressure of the air upon the reflecting body, caused by
the sun, or other shining body, and is but a contrary endeavour; as if
two men should press with their breasts upon the two ends of a staff,
though they did not remove one another, yet they would find in
themselves a great disposition to press backward upon whatsoever is
behind them, though not a total going out of their places. Such is the
way of reflecting light. Now, when the falling on of the sun-beams is
oblique, the action of them is nevertheless perpendicular to the
superficies it falls on. And therefore the reflecting body, by
resisting, turneth back that motion perpendicularly, as from F to E; but
taketh nothing from the force that goes on parallel in the line of E H,
because the motion never presses. And thus of the two motions from F to
E, and from E to H, is a compounded motion in the line F H, which maketh
an angle in B G, equal to the angle F G E.