The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 07 (of 11) — Thomas Hobbes — John Shaqi
The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 07 (of 11)
Thomas Hobbes · en
_B._ The mathematics and astronomy. But for that sublunary physics,
which is commonly called natural philosophy, I have not read of any
nation that studied it earlier than the Greeks, from whom it proceeded
to the Romans. Yet both Greeks and Romans were more addicted to moral
than to natural philosophy; in which kind we have their writings, but
loosely and incoherently, written upon no other principles than their
own passions and presumptions, without any respect to the laws of
commonwealth, which are the ground and measure of all true morality. So
that their books tend rather to teach men to censure than to obey the
laws; which has been a great hindrance to the peace of the western world
ever since. But they that seriously applied themselves to natural
philosophy were but few, as Plato and Aristotle, whose works we have;
and Epicurus whose doctrine we have in Lucretius. The writings of
Philolaus and many other curious students being by fire or negligence
now lost: though the doctrines of Philolaus concerning the motion of the
earth have been revived by Copernicus, and explained and confirmed by
Galileo now of late.
_A._ But methinks the natural philosophy of Plato, and Aristotle, and
the rest, should have been cultivated and made to flourish by their
disciples.
_B._ Whom do you mean, the successors of Plato, Epicurus, Aristotle, and
the other first philosophers? It may be some of them may have been
learned and worthy men. But not long after, and down to the time of our
Saviour and his Apostles, they were for the most part a sort of needy,
ignorant, impudent, cheating fellows, who by the profession of the
doctrine of those first philosophers got their living. For at that time,
the name of philosophy was so much in fashion and honour amongst great
persons, that every rich man had a philosopher of one sect or another to
be a schoolmaster to his children. And these were they that feigning
Christianity, with their disputing and readiness of talking got
themselves into Christian commons, and brought so many heresies into the
primitive Church, every one retaining still a tang of what they had been
used to teach.
_A._ But those heresies were all condemned in the first Council of Nice.
_B._ Yes. But the Arian heresy for a long time flourished no less than
the Roman, and was upheld by divers Emperors, and never fully
extinguished as long as there were Vandals in Christendom. Besides,
there arose daily other sects, opposing their philosophy to the doctrine
of the Councils concerning the divinity of our Saviour; as how many
persons he was, how many natures he had. And thus it continued till the
time of Charlemagne, when he and Pope Leo the third divided the power of
the empire into temporal and spiritual.
_A._ A very unequal division.
_B._ Why? Which of them think you had the greater share?
_A._ No doubt, the Emperor: for he only had the sword.
_B._ When the swords are in the hands of men, whether had you rather
command the men or the swords?