The Plague of Athens, which hapned in the second year of the Peloponnesian Warre: First described in Greek by Thucydides; then in Latin by Lucretius. Now attempted in English — Thomas Hobbes — John Shaqi
The Plague of Athens, which hapned in the second year of the Peloponnesian Warre: First described in Greek by Thucydides; then in Latin by Lucretius. Now attempted in English
Thomas Hobbes · en
TRANSCRIBER’S NOTE
Italic text is denoted by _underscores_.
Spaced (gesperrt) text is denoted by ~t i l d e s i g n s~.
Text that is both gesperrt and italic is denoted by =equals signs=.
The long-form s ( ſ ) in the original text has been replaced by
the modern s in this etext.
A few obvious typographical errors and punctuation errors have been
corrected after careful comparison with other occurrences within
the text and consultation of external sources.
Some minor changes to the text are noted at the end of the book.
[Illustration: (publisher colophon)]
Let this Book be Printed.
_Roger L’Estrange._
~MARCH~ 28.
1665.
[Illustration: (decorative border)]
THE
Plague of Athens,
Which hapned in the
SECOND YEAR
OF THE
Peloponnesian Warre.
First described in _Greek_ by _Thucydides_;
Then in _Latin_ by _Lucretius_.
_Now attempted in English_,
By ~THO. SPRAT~.
=LONDON=,
Printed by _E. C._ for _Henry Brome_, at the Gun in
_Ivy-lane_, 1665.
[Illustration: (decorative border)]
_To my Worthy and Learned Friend, Dr._ Walter Pope, _late Proctor of
the University of_ Oxford.
=SIR=,
I Know not what pleasure you could take in bestowing your commands so
unprofitably, unless it be that for which Nature sometimes cherishes
and allows Monsters, The love of Variety. This onely delight you will
receive by turning over this rude and unpolisht Copy, and comparing
it with my excellent Patterns, the _Greek_ and _Latin_. By this you
will see how much a noble Subject is chang’d and disfigured by an ill
hand, and what reason _Alexander_ had to forbid his Picture to be
drawn but by some celebrated Pencil. In _Greek Thucydides_ so well
and so lively expresses it, that I know not which is more a Poem,
his description, or that of _Lucretius_. Though it must be said,
that the _Historian_ had a vast advantage over the _Poet_; He having
been present on the place, and assaulted by the disease himself, had
the horror familiar to his Eyes, and all the shapes of the _misery_
still remaining on his mind, which must needs make a great impression
on his Pen and Fancie. Whereas the _Poet_ was forced to allow his
foot-steps, and onely work on that matter he allow’d him. This I
speak, because it may in some measure too excuse my own defects:
For being so far remov’d from the place whereon the disease acted
its Tragedy; and time having denied us many of the circumstances,
customes of the Countrey, and other small things which would be of
great use to any one who did intend to be perfect on the subject;
besides onely writing by an _Idea_ of that which I never yet saw, nor
care to feel, (being not of the humor of the Painter in Sir _Philip
Sidney_, who thrust himself into the midst of a Fight, that he might
the better delineate it) having, I say, all these disadvantages,
and many more, for which I must onely blame my self, it cannot be
expected, that I should come near equalling him in whom none of the