Monsieur Judas: A Paradox — David Hume — John Shaqi
Monsieur Judas: A Paradox
David Hume · en
"That remains to be proved. See here, old boy. I was called down here
about this case, and as the wiseacres of Jarlchester have settled it
to their own satisfaction that there is--to their minds--no more need
for my services, I am discharged--dismissed--turned out by Jarlchester
& Co.; but as I don't often get such a clever case to look after, I'm
going to find out the whole affair for my own pleasure."
"It seems a disease with you, this insatiable curiosity to find out
things."
"Ay, that it is. We call it detective fever. Join me in this case, and
you'll find yourself suffering from the disease in a wonderfully short
space of time."
"No, thank you; I prefer my freedom."
"And your idleness! Well, go your own way, Roger. If you won't take
the medicine I prescribe, you certainly won't be cured. Unrequited
love will lie heavy on your heart, and your health and work will
suffer in consequence. Both will be dull, and between doctors and
critics you will have a high old time of it, dear boy."
"What nonsense you do talk!" said Roger, fretfully.
"Eh! do you think so? Perhaps I'm like Touchstone, and use my folly as
a stalking-horse behind which to shoot my wit. I'm not sure if I'm
quoting rightly, but the moral is apparent. However, all this is not
to the point--to my point, I mean--and if you have not got detective
fever I have, so I will use you as a medicine to allay the disease."
"Fire away, old fellow," said Axton, turning his chair half round so
as to place his tell-tale face in the shadow, thereby rendering it
undecipherable to Fanks; "I'm all attention."
Octavius at once produced his secretive little note-book and vicious
little pencil, which latter assumed dramatic significance in the
nervous fingers that held it.
"I'm ready," said Fanks, letting his pencil-point jest on a clean
white page. "Question first: Did you know this dead man?"
"Good heavens, no. I don't even know his name nor his appearance."
"You have never seen him?"
"How could I have seen him? I am exploring the neighbourhood, and
generally start on my travels in the morning early and return late.
This man arrived at five, went to bed at nine, and as I didn't come
back till ten o'clock I didn't see him on that night; next morning he
was dead."
"Did you not see the corpse?"
"No," said Roger, with a shudder, "I don't care for such 'wormy
circumstance.'"
"Wormy circumstance is good," remarked Fanks, approvingly. "Keats, I
think. Yes, I thought so. I see you don't care for horrors. You are
not of the Poe-Baudelaire school of grave-digging, corpse-craving
poesy."
"Hardly! I don't believe in going to the gutter for inspiration."
"Ah! now you are thinking of MM. Zola and Gondrecourt, my friend; but,
dear me, how one thing does lead to another. We are discussing
literature instead of murder. Let us return to our first loves. Why
didn't you attend the inquest?"
"Because I didn't want to."