The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol. I., Part D.: From Elizabeth to James I.
David Hume · en
The Commissioners appointed by the English court for the examination of
this great cause, were the duke of Norfolk, the earl of Sussex, and Sir
Ralph Sadler; and York was named as the place of conference. Lesley,
bishop of Ross, the lords Herreis, Levingstone, and Boyde, with three
persons more, appeared as commissioners from the queen of Scots. The
earl of Murray, regent, the earl of Morton, the bishop of Orkney, Lord
Lindesey, and the abbot of Dunfermling were appointed commissioners from
the king and kingdom of Scotland. Secretary Lidington, George Buchanan,
the famous poet and historian, with some others, were named as their
assistants.
It was a great circumstance in Elizabeth’s glory, that she was thus
chosen umpire between the factions of a neighboring kingdom, which
had during many centuries entertained the most violent jealousy and
animosity against England; and her felicity was equally rare, in having
the fortunes and fame of so dangerous a rival, who had long given
her the greatest inquietude, now entirely at her disposal. Some
circumstances of her late conduct had discovered a bias towards the side
of Mary: her prevailing interests led her to favor the enemies of that
princess: the professions of impartiality which she had made were open
and frequent; and she had so far succeeded, that each side accused her
commissioners of partiality towards their adversaries.[*] She herself
appears, by the instructions given them, to have fixed no plan for the
decision; but she knew that the advantages which she should reap must
be great, whatever issue the cause might take. If Mary’s crimes could be
ascertained by undoubted proof, she could forever blast the reputation
of that princess, and might justifiably detain her forever a prisoner
in England: if the evidence fell short of conviction, it was intended
to restore her to the throne, but with such strict limitations, as would
leave Elizabeth perpetual arbiter of all differences between the
parties in Scotland, and render her in effect absolute mistress of the
kingdom.[**]
* Anderson, vol. iv. part ii. p. 40.
** Anderson, vol. iv. part ii. p. 14, 15, etc. Goodall, vol.
ii p. 110.