The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol. I., Part D.: From Elizabeth to James I.
David Hume · en
Mary’s commissioners, before they gave in their complaint, against her
enemies in Scotland, entered a protest, that their appearance in
the cause should nowise affect the independence of her crown, or
be construed as a mark of subordination to England: the English
commissioners received this protest, but with a reserve to the claim of
England. The complaint of that princess was next read, and contained a
detail of the injuries which she had suffered since her marriage with
Bothwell: that her subjects had taken arms against her, on pretence of
freeing her from captivity; that when she put herself into their hands,
they had committed her to close custody in Lochlevin; had placed her
son, an infant, on her throne; had again taken arms against her
after her deliverance from prison; had rejected all her proposals for
accommodation, had given battle to her troops; and had obliged her, for
the safety of her person, to take shelter in England.[*] The earl
of Murray, in answer to this complaint, gave a summary and imperfect
account of the late transactions: that the earl of Bothwell, the known
murderer of the late king, had, a little after committing that crime,
seized the person of the queen and led her to Dunbar; that he acquired
such influence over her as to gain her consent to marry him, and he had
accordingly procured a divorce from his former wife, and had pretended
to celebrate his nuptials with the queen; that the scandal of this
transaction, the dishonor which it brought on the nation, the danger to
which the infant prince was exposed from the attempts of that audacious
man, had obliged the nobility to take arms, and oppose his criminal
enterprises; that after Mary, in order to save him, had thrown herself
into their hands, she still discovered such a violent attachment to him,
that they found it necessary, for their own and the public safety,
to confine her person during a season, till Bothwell and the other
murderers of her husband could be tried and punished for their crimes;
and that during this confinement she had voluntarily, without compulsion
or violence, merely from disgust at the inquietude and vexations
attending power, resigned her crown to her only son, and had appointed
the earl of Murray regent during the minority.[**]
* Anderson, vol. iv. part ii. p. 52. Goodall, vol. ii. p.
128. Haynes, p. 478.
** Anderson, vol. iv. part ii. p. 64, et seq. Goodall, vol.
ii. p. 144.