The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol. I., Part D.: From Elizabeth to James I. — David Hume — John Shaqi
The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol. I., Part D.: From Elizabeth to James I.
David Hume · en
We may here see, that these new saints were no less lofty in their
pretensions than the ancient hierarchy: no wonder they were enraged
against the latter as their rivals in dominion. They joined to all these
declarations an address to the established church; and they affixed this
title to it: “To the generation of Antichrist, the pestilent prelates
and their ‘shavelings’[*] in Scotland, the congregation of Christ Jesus
within the same sayeth.” The tenor of the manifesto was suitable to the
title. They told the ecclesiastics, “As ye by tyranny intend not only to
destroy our bodies, but also by the same to hold our souls in bondage
of the devil, subject to idolatry, so shall we, with all the force
and power which God shall grant unto us, execute just vengeance and
punishment upon you: yea, we shall begin that same war which God
commanded Israel to execute against the Canaanites; that is, contract of
peace shall never be made till you desist from your open idolatry,
and cruel persecution of God’s children. And this, in the name of the
eternal God, and of his Son Christ Jesus, whose verity we profess, and
gospel we have preached, and holy sacraments rightly administered,
we signify unto you to be our intent, so far as God will assist us
to withstand your idolatry. Take this for warning, and be not
deceived.”[**] With these outrageous symptoms commenced in Scotland that
cant, hypocrisy, and fanaticism which long infested that kingdom, and
which, though now mollified by the lenity of the civil power, is still
ready to break out on all occasions.
The queen regent, finding such obstinate zeal in the rebels, was content
to embrace the counsels of Argyle and the prior of St. Andrew’s, and
to form an accommodation with them. She was received into Perth, which
submitted, on her promising an indemnity for past offences, and engaging
not to leave any French garrison in the place. Complaints, very
ill founded, immediately arose concerning the infraction of this
capitulation. Some of the inhabitants, it was pretended, were molested
on account of the late violences; and some companies of Scotch soldiers,
supposed to be in French pay, were quartered in the town; which step,
though taken on very plausible grounds, was loudly exclaimed against by
the congregation.[***]
* A contemptuous term for a priest.
* Keith, p. 85, 86, 87. Knox, p. 134.
* Knox, p. 139.