The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol. I., Part D.: From Elizabeth to James I. — David Hume — John Shaqi
The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol. I., Part D.: From Elizabeth to James I.
David Hume · en
The constable Montmorency had always opposed the marriage of the dauphin
with the queen of Scots, and had foretold that, by forming such close
connections with Scotland, the ancient league would be dissolved; and
the natives of that kingdom, jealous of a foreign yoke, would soon
become, instead of allies, attached by interest and inclination, the
most inveterate enemies to the French government. But though the event
seemed now to have justified the prudence of that aged minister, it is
not improbable, considering the violent counsels by which France
was governed, that the insurrection was deemed a favorable event; as
affording a pretence for sending over armies, for entirely subduing the
country, for attainting the rebels,[*] and for preparing means thence to
invade England, and support Mary’s title to the crown of that kingdom.
The leaders of the congregation, well acquainted with these views, were
not insensible of their danger, and saw that their only safety consisted
in the vigor and success of their measures. They were encouraged by
the intelligence received of the sudden death of Henry II.; and having
passed an act from their own authority, depriving the queen dowager of
the regency, and ordering all the French troops to evacuate the kingdom,
they collected forces to put their edict in execution against them. They
again became masters of Edinburgh; but found themselves unable to keep
long possession of that city. Their tumultuary armies, assembled in
haste, and supported by no pay, soon separated upon the least disaster,
or even any delay of success; and were incapable of resisting such
veteran troops as the French, who were also seconded by some of the
Scottish nobility, among whom the earl of Bothwell distinguished
himself., Hearing that the marquis of Elbeuf, brother to the regent,
was levying an army against them in Germany, they thought themselves
excusable for applying, in this extremity, to the assistance of England;
and as the sympathy of religion, as well as regard to national liberty,
had now counterbalanced the ancient animosity against that kingdom, this
measure was the result of inclination no less than of interest.[**]
[5] Maitland of Lidington, therefore, and Robert Melvil, were secretly
despatched by the congregation to solicit succors from Elizabeth.
* Forbes, vol. i. p. 139. Thuan. lib. xxiv. c. 13.
** See note E, at the end of the volume.