The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol. I., Part D.: From Elizabeth to James I. — David Hume — John Shaqi
The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol. I., Part D.: From Elizabeth to James I.
David Hume · en
The wise council of Elizabeth did not long deliberate in agreeing to
this request, which concurred so well with the views and interests of
their mistress. Cecil in particular represented to the queen, that the
union of the crowns of Scotland and France, both of them the hereditary
enemies of England, was ever regarded as a pernicious event; and her
father, as well as Protector Somerset, had employed every expedient both
of war and negotiation to prevent it: that the claim which Mary advanced
to the crown rendered the present situation of England still more
dangerous, and demanded on the part of the queen the greatest vigilance
and precaution; that the capacity, ambition, and exorbitant views of the
family of Guise, who now governed the French counsels, were sufficiently
known; and they themselves made no secret of their design to place
their niece on the throne of England: that deeming themselves secure of
success, they had already, somewhat imprudently and prematurely, taken
off the mask; and Throgmorton, the English ambassador at Paris,
sent over, by every courier, incontestable proofs of their hostile
intentions:[*] that they only waited till Scotland should be entirely
subdued; and having thus deprived the English of the advantages
resulting from their situation and naval power, they prepared means for
subverting the queen’s authority: that the zealous Catholics in England,
discontented with the present government, and satisfied in the legality
of Mary’s title, would bring them considerable reënforcement, and would
disturb every measure of defence against that formidable power: that the
only expedient for preventing these designs, was to seize the present
opportunity, and take advantage of a like zeal in the Protestants of
Scotland; nor could any doubt be entertained with regard to the justice
of a measure founded on such evident necessity, and directed only to the
ends of self-preservation: that though a French war, attended with great
expense, seemed the necessary consequence of supporting the malecontents
in Scotland, that power, if removed to the continent, would be much less
formidable; and a small disbursement at present would, in the end,
be found the greatest frugality: and that the domestic dissensions of
France, which every day augmented, together with the alliance of Philip,
who, notwithstanding his bigotry and hypocrisy, would never permit the
entire conquest of England, were sufficient to secure the queen against
the dangerous ambition and resentment of the house of Guise.[**]
* Forbes, vol. i. p. 134, 136, 149, 150, 159, 165, 181, 194,
229, 231, 235--241, 253.
** Forbes, vol. i. p 387 Jebb, vol. i. p. 448. Keith,
Append. 24.