The Emperor Marcus Aurelius : $b A study in ideals — Marcus Aurelius — John Shaqi
The Emperor Marcus Aurelius : $b A study in ideals
Marcus Aurelius · en
did not pass, nor were his people comforted. The ancient world never
recovered from the blow, Niebuhr says. While it yet raged, another call
to arms came, this time from the Danube.
It was the severest onset of the barbarians which the Roman Empire had
yet endured. All the tribes from the Rhine to the Don, Teutonic and
Slavonic, seemed in league against it. These wild Northmen, chaste and
strong of limb, had hurled themselves on the Danube frontier and broken
into the sacred precincts of the _Pax Romana_. The Danube passed,
Pannonia, Dacia, Greece were overrun. The prints of Northern hoofs were
on the plains of Rhætia and Noricum; and the wild Marcomanni were seen
in the streets of Venice and Padua. Well might the Romans fear that
it would be with them now as it was in the days of Hannibal. Aye, and
even worse; for the Romans of the second century of the Empire were
not the Romans of the second or third century before the fall of the
Republic; and to replace a Scipio and a Marcellus, they had for leader
not a Vespasian or a Trajan, but a sickly “Greekling,” “a philosophical
old woman,” as Avidius Cassius used to call him. This was their Emperor
Aurelius, and in these wars on the Danube he was amply to refute these
taunts of the men of rougher mould. His was the great task of stemming
the first inflow of those nomadic tribes which, two centuries later,
swept in full flood-tide over the Empire; and he performed it well if
not greatly.
The heralds of the revolt found him at his work of peace and
legislation, of charity and self-culture in the capital. Now came
the test of his principles of devotion to duty. Would he face the
loneliness, spiritual and intellectual, the barbarity, the long-drawn
desolation of a campaign in the dull plains of Hungary? Would he be a
leader to his people? or would he, like certain selfish souls, wrap
himself in himself and seek his own advancement towards the sapiency of
the perfect Stoic at the cost of his people? It was the test of a man;
and he answered well to it. He elected to lead the troops in person.