Pages 284, 564, Εἰς τὸν Ἰουλιανοῦ τῆς Σοφίας λεγόμενον λιμένα: ἐν τῷ Ἰουλιανισίῳ λιμένι τῆς Σοφίας. Footnote 1070: Page 700. Footnote 1071: _Fragm. Hist. Græc._, v. p. 38. Footnote 1072: Cedrenus, vol. i. p. 712. Footnote 1073: _Paschal Chron._, pp. 622, 700; Theophanes, pp. 284, 364, 564. Footnote 1074: Leo Gramm., p. 135; Theophanes, p. 564. Footnote 1075: _Notitia ad Reg. III._; Leo Diaconus, v. pp. 83, 84. Footnote 1076: Zosimus, p. 139; Evagrius, ii. c. xiii.; Cedrenus, vol. i. p. 611. Footnote 1077: Zonaras, xiv. c. i. p. 1205. Footnote 1078: Zosimus, pp. 139, 140. Footnote 1079: Zosimus, _ut supra_. Footnote 1080: Malalas, p. 479. Footnote 1081: See Epistle 58. Footnote 1082: Marcellinus Comes, “Portus Juliani, undis suis rotalibus exhaustus cœno effoso purgatus est;” Suidas, ad Anastasium. Footnote 1083: The plural form of the name (τῶν Σοφιῶν) may allude to the two divisions of the harbour. See Mordtmann, p. 55: “La configuration actuelle permet encore de distinguer un port intérieur et un port extérieur, séparés par une étroite digne.” Footnote 1084: Leo Gramm., p. 135; Anonymus, iii. p. 45. Footnote 1085: Anonymus, ii. p. 30. Footnote 1086: _Menæa_, January 27. This point was known also as ἐν τῷ μούλῳ τοῦ ἁγίου Θωμᾶ (Theophanes, p. 673). Footnote 1087: _Paschal Chron._, p. 622. Footnote 1088: _Ibid._, p. 700. Footnote 1089: _Ibid._, _ut supra_. Footnote 1090: Theophanes, p. 564. Footnote 1091: Evagrius, ii. c. xiii. Footnote 1092: Nicetas Chon., p. 733. Footnote 1093: Leo Diaconus, v. pp. 83, 84. Footnote 1094: Nicetas Chon., p. 585. Footnote 1095: Procopius, _De Æd._, i. c. iv. Footnote 1096: Theophanes, p. 385. Footnote 1097: Anonymus, iii. p. 46. Footnote 1098: Codinus, p. 105. Footnote 1099: Nicetas Chon., p. 733; Michael Psellus (Sathas, _Bibl. Græc. Med. Ævi._, vol. v. p. 214). Footnote 1100: Lib. iii. p. 45. Footnote 1101: Lib. ii. p. 34. Footnote 1102: Pachymeres, vol. i. pp. 365, 366. Footnote 1103: See below, p. 295, note 5. Footnote 1104: _Itinéraires Russes en Orient_, pp. 120, 121. Footnote 1105: Leunclavius, _Pand. Hist. Turc._, s. 200, is the first writer after the Conquest who refers to it: “Ipsa porta (_i.e._ Contoscalion) velut intra sinum quemdam abscedit versus unbem, et ab altera parte proximum sibi portum habet, pro triremibus, in mare se porrigentem et muris circumdatum.” The silence of Gyllius regarding the Kontoscalion is strange, unless he has confounded it with Kadriga Limani. Footnote 1106: Vol. i. p. 365. Footnote 1107: _Liber Insularum Archipelagi_, p. 121. “Propinqua huic (Vlanga) Condoscali vel Arsena restat.” Footnote 1108: Lib. xvii. p. 854. Cf. Cantacuzene, iv. pp. 72, 74. Footnote 1109: