Celtic art in Pagan and Christian times — John Stuart Mill — John Shaqi
Celtic art in Pagan and Christian times
John Stuart Mill · en
The Neolithic inhabitants of this country, whom the Goidelic Celts
found here on their arrival, were ethnologically a small dark-haired,
black-eyed race, with long skulls of a type which is still to be
seen amongst the Silurians of South Wales.[44] The ethnological
characteristics of the Goidels were entirely different: they were tall,
fair-haired, round-headed, with high cheek-bones, a large mouth, and
aquiline nose. In studying the past much must necessarily be more or
less conjectural, and we can never hope to see otherwise than “as in
a glass darkly.” As far, however, as it is possible to ascertain the
facts, it appears probable that the advancing wave of Goidelic Celts
did not entirely overwhelm the aborigines or drive them before it.
Most likely the big Goidels made the small Iberians “hewers of wood
and drawers of water,” and in time either absorbed them or themselves
became absorbed.
[44] Boyd Dawkins’ _Early Man in Britain_, chapter ix.
THE CHRONOLOGY OF THE BRONZE AGE IN EUROPE
Actual dates in years can only be ascertained by means of historical
documents, and therefore no chronology of the ages of Stone, Bronze,
and Iron is possible except where contact can be established between
the prehistoric (or non-historic) races living in those stages
of culture in Northern and Central Europe, and the more advanced
civilisations on the shores of the Mediterranean and in Asia. Long
before direct contact took place between the northern barbarians
and the Egyptians, Assyrians, Phœnicians, Greeks, Romans, and other
great nations of antiquity, through invasions or immigrations, a
more indirect contact must have existed for centuries, owing to the
trade in such things as amber, gold, bronze, and tin. Dates have been
fixed approximately by the finding of imported objects in different
countries, and by studying their geographical distribution. Other
almost untouched fields of investigation which would help to solve many
of the problems of prehistoric chronology, are the migration of symbols
and patterns and comparative ornament.
The attempts that have been made to fix the duration of the Ages of
Stone and Bronze in actual years are at the best mere guesses, but
it may be worth while stating the conclusions arrived at by some of
the leading European archæologists, so as to give a rough idea of the
time at which bronze was in use for the manufacture of implements and
weapons in different countries.
Egypt during the greater part of its existence as a civilised nation
was in the Bronze Age. The copper mines of the Sinaitic peninsula
were worked as early as the Fourth Dynasty, as is proved by the rock
inscriptions of Sneferu (B.C. 3998-3969) at Wady Maghera.[45] Bronze
was certainly used by the ancient Egyptians in the fourteenth century
B.C., and in the tomb of Queen Aah Hotep, although bronze weapons were
found, iron was conspicuous by its absence, indicating that the latter
metal had not come into general use in the fifteenth century B.C.