Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Various Aspects of the Problem of Abortion in New Zealand — John Stuart Mill — John Shaqi
Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Various Aspects of the Problem of Abortion in New Zealand
John Stuart Mill · en
Several witnesses mentioned ignorance of matters relating to sex as
being frequently responsible for pregnancy in the unmarried. This is
undoubtedly the case, and the responsibility of parents, guardians, and
teachers in this matter is evident. The evil influence of drinking on
young people was also stressed, medical and social workers being well
aware of the importance of this factor. Alcohol consumption need not be
excessive to undermine self-control and dull the moral sense.
(4) CHANGES IN THE SOCIAL OUTLOOK.
The Committee believes that, in the altered social outlook,
particularly towards the rearing of large families, lies a very
important cause for the present situation. This aspect of the matter is
intimately interwoven with the economic considerations already set
forth, but extends far beyond them.
The point of view of what we believe to be a very large body of women
is illustrated by the following evidence, which is but one of many
similar expressions of opinion heard by the Committee. This witness,
speaking on behalf of a group with incomes of £300 to £400 per annum,
stated:--
"On present incomes, not more than two or three children at the
outside can be given educational and economic opportunities. It may
be said that it is quite possible to mitigate to a quite tolerable
degree the strain put upon the parents by the provision of (1)
adequate wages for husbands, and (2) a system of domestic help for
wives. With regard to (1) it is not probable within our lifetime
that everybody will be guaranteed an income adequate to the needs
of a family of, say, three children--'needs' as viewed by educated
parents. The most sympathetic administration would have its hands
full for many a year coping with the problem of helping those
thousands of our people who have been just on or very near the
bread-line. Those worst off hitherto need help first. A man earning
between three and four hundred a year should not claim Government
help to breed children, when there are such numbers of people
living on a much lower wage. But it must be perfectly clear to each
member of the Commission who figures the matter out that a salary
of less than £400 will not enable more than two children to be
given such chance of development as every parent reasonably
desires. It is pertinent to ask here what is the average number of
children in the families of the British middle class--which is
mainly the stratum from which our legislators, rulers, and
magistrates have been drawn. Do such people breed freely?
Self-respecting parents prefer to do without such Government help
as family allowances; but knowing the cost of training a child they
claim the rights first, to decide how many children they will
breed, and, secondly, to live themselves normally satisfied married
lives. Few women, moreover, of average intelligence are to-day