Report of the Juvenile Delinquency Committee — John Stuart Mill — John Shaqi
Report of the Juvenile Delinquency Committee
John Stuart Mill · en
"Registration of comics, of course, amounts to censorship. There
is, however, no question of literary merit or the spread of
knowledge, and the view that an adult should in general be free to
read what he likes does not apply in the case of publications
primarily intended for children. If it is accepted as proper to
censor films there can be little objection to censoring comics.
"We therefore suggest that the Select Committee might consider
whether an authority might be set up to approve and register
comics. There could be an Appeal Board similar to that in respect
of films to consider complaints against any decision of the
registering authority.
"If this suggestion is unacceptable an alternative might be an
amendment to the legislation to be introduced enabling the Court in
the case of comics to take into account as one of the factors in
considering whether they are objectionable matters of grammar,
language and visual standards."
The present Committee is of opinion that there is a good deal of force
in the suggestions put forward in this part of the report of the
Department of Justice, and our view is that these suggestions should be
referred to the Minister of Education with a request that he consider
them favourably and forward his conclusions to the Government.
"(3) We have come across cases in which publications have been
advertised to such persons and in such a way as to endeavour to
sell them or attract the public on the basis of their emphasis or
alleged emphasis on sex, horror or violence.
"If a publication--for instance, a medical book--is displayed in a
shop window open at a page of illustrations this would probably be
an offence against the present law even though the book may itself
be unobjectionable. There is however, another type of case which
would not be caught by the law as it stands, but which we think
equally deserves to be prohibited. An example of what we have in
mind is an advertisement which is put out by a mail-order firm and
is obviously designed to 'sell the book on its sex.' This open
appeal to salacious instincts is most objectionable and we can see
no justification for allowing it. Whether or not the publication
itself is indecent, we think the type of advertisement we refer to
should be prohibited by law.