The electron, its isolation and measurement and the determination of some of its properties — John Stuart Mill — John Shaqi
The electron, its isolation and measurement and the determination of some of its properties
John Stuart Mill · en
is equally difficult to see how there can be, in the atoms of a solid
body, electrons having all kinds of natural frequencies so that some
are always found to absorb and ultimately be ejected by impressed light
of any particular frequency.
However, then, we may interpret the phenomenon of the emission of
electrons under the influence of ether waves, whether upon the basis
of the Thomson-Einstein assumption of bundles of localized energy
traveling through the ether, or upon the basis of a peculiar properly
of the inside of an atom which enables it to absorb continuously
incident energy and emit only explosively, the observed
characteristics of the effect seem to furnish proof that the emission
of energy by an atom is a discontinuous or explosive process. This
was the fundamental assumption of Planck’s so-called quantum theory
[Pg 254]
of radiation. The Thomson-Einstein theory makes both the absorption
and the emission sudden or discontinuous, while the loading theory
first suggested by Planck makes the absorption continuous and only the
emission explosive.
The new facts in the field of radiation which have been discovered
through the study of the properties of the electron seem, then, to
require in any case a very fundamental revision or extension of
classical theories of absorption and emission of radiant energy. The
Thomson-Einstein theory throws the whole burden of accounting for the
new facts upon the unknown nature of the ether, and makes radical
assumptions about its structure. The loading theory leaves the ether
alone and puts the burden of an explanation upon the unknown conditions
and laws which exist inside the atom.
In the first edition of this book, finished in 1917, I expressed the
view that the chances were in favor of the ultimate triumph of the
second alternative. In 1921, however, I presented at the Third Solvay
Congress some new photo-electric experiments[185] which seemed at the
time to point strongly the other way.
These experiments consisted in showing with greater certainty than
had been possible in earlier years[186] that the stopping potentials
of different metals , , , when brought in succession
before the same Faraday cylinder (see Fig. 35) and illuminated
with a given frequency, were strictly identical. The significance of
these results for the theory of quanta lay in the fact that I deduced
[Pg 255]
from them the conclusion that in the photo-electric effect, contrary
to preceding views including my own, the energy “” is
transferred without loss from the ether-waves to the free, i.e., the
conduction electrons of the metal, and not merely to those bound in
atoms. This seemed to take the absorbing mechanism out of the atom
entirely, and to make the property of imparting the energy
to an electron, whether free or bound, an intrinsic property of light
itself.
Fig. 35—Showing how photo-electric stopping potentials
of different metals are compared by rotating and in
vacuo into the position of .