The electron, its isolation and measurement and the determination of some of its properties
John Stuart Mill · en
It would not be in keeping with the method of modern science to make
any dogmatic assertion as to the indivisibility of the electron. Such
assertions used to be made in high-school classes with respect to
the atoms of the elements, but the far-seeing among physicists, like
Faraday, were always careful to disclaim any belief in the necessary
ultimateness of the atoms of chemistry, and that simply because there
existed until recently no basis for asserting anything about the
insides of the atom. We knew that there was a smallest thing which took
part in chemical reactions and we named that thing the atom, leaving
its insides entirely to the future.
Precisely similarly the electron was defined as the smallest quantity
of electricity which ever was found to appear in electrolysis, and
nothing was then said or is now said about its necessary ultimateness.
Our experiments have, however, now shown that this quantity is capable
of isolation and exact measurement, and that all the kinds of charges
which we have been able to investigate are exact multiples of it. Its
value is .
I. A SECOND METHOD OF OBTAINING
I have presented one way of measuring this charge, but there is an
indirect method of arriving at it which was worked out independently by
Rutherford and Geiger[95]
[Pg 159]
and Regener.[96] The unique feature in this
method consists in actually counting the number of -particles
shot off per second by a small speck of radium or polonium through a
given solid angle and computing from this the number of these particles
emitted per second by one gram of the radium or polonium. Regener
made his determination by counting the scintillations produced on a
diamond screen in the focal plane of his observing microscope. He then
caught in a condenser all the -particles emitted per second
by a known quantity of his polonium and determined the total quantity
of electricity delivered to the condenser by them. This quantity of
electricity divided by the number of particles emitted per second
gave the charge on each particle. Because the -particles
had been definitely proved to be helium atoms[97] and the value of
found for them showed that if they were helium they
ought to carry double the electronic charge, Regener divided his result
by 2 and obtained
He estimated his error at 3 per cent. Rutherford and Geiger made their
count by letting the -particles from a speck of radium
shoot into a chamber and produce therein sufficient ionization by
collision to cause an electrometer needle to jump every time one of
them entered. These authors measured the total charge as Regener did
and, dividing by 2 the charge on each -particle, they obtained