The electron, its isolation and measurement and the determination of some of its properties
John Stuart Mill · en
[Pg 160]
All determinations of from radioactive data involve one or the
other of these two counts, namely, that of Rutherford and Geiger or
that of Regener. Thus, Boltwood and Rutherford[98] measured the total
weight of helium produced in a second by a known weight of radium.
Dividing this by the number of -particles (helium atoms)
obtained from Rutherford and Geiger’s count, they obtain the mass of
one atom of helium from which the number in a given weight, or volume
since the gas density is known, is at once obtained. They published for
the number of molecules in a gas per cubic centimeter at 0°76
cm., , which corresponds to
This last method, like that of the Brownian movements, is actually
a determination of , rather than of , since is
obtained from it only through the relation .
Indeed, this is true of all methods of
estimating , so far as I am aware, except the oil-drop method
and the Rutherford-Geiger-Regener method, and of these two the latter
represents the measurement of the mean charge on an immense
number of -particles. Thus a person who wished to contend
that the unit charge appearing in electrolysis is only a mean charge
which may be made up of individual charges which vary widely among
themselves, in much the same way in which the atomic weight assigned
to neon has recently been shown to be a mean of the weights of
at least two different elements inseparable chemically, could not be
gainsaid, save on the basis of the evidence contained in the oil-drop
[Pg 161]
experiments; for these constitute the only method which has been found
of measuring directly the charge on each individual ion. It is of
interest and significance for the present discussion, however, that the
mean charge on an -particle has been directly measured and
that it comes out, within the limits of error of the measurement, at
exactly two electrons—as it should according to the evidence furnished
by measurements on the -particles.
II. THE EVIDENCE FOR THE EXISTENCE OF A SUB-ELECTRON
Now, the foregoing contention has actually been made, and evidence has
been presented which purports to show that electric charges exist which
are much smaller than the electron. Since this raises what may properly
be called the most fundamental question of modern physics, the evidence
needs very careful consideration. This evidence can best be appreciated
through a brief historical review of its origin.