The History of Duelling. Vol. 2 (of 2) — John Stuart Mill — John Shaqi
The History of Duelling. Vol. 2 (of 2)
John Stuart Mill · en
These observations are not intended to condemn this philosophical view
of the subject. Were these excesses noticed at the pistol’s muzzle, it
would only be adding murder to corruption; and, as society is
constituted, when an electioneering hustings may be oftentimes compared
to a stall at Billinsgate, a candidate who seeks to vindicate what he is
complacently pleased to call _his honour_, must indeed be a Quixotic
character, when he in general conscientiously knows that every syllable
of his address to the voters is void of veracity, and all his pledges
futile and false.
The frequent occurrence of duels, in former times, may also be
attributed to the mode of living in days fortunately gone by. Hard
drinking is now rarely heard of; and when it was in fashion, insults
were often given under the influence of liquor, and vindicated under the
plea of excitement from the preceding night’s excesses. In Ireland it
was not uncommon for parties to sit up carousing during the entire night
preceding the murderous meeting; and the break of day, through the
casement of the hall of revelry, was the signal for departure to the
field. One of the greatest curses of intemperance is the extreme
susceptibility which it gives our pride and vanity; and if there is any
ground for the proverb, _in vino veritas_, it may be attributed to the
fact, that under this potent influence we sometimes know ourselves
better than in our more sober hours. The pangs of repentance are more
bitter, although they may be transient in these moments of excited
reflection, when the past, the present, and the future are exaggerated
in all their circumstances by an imagination morbidly vivid. It is then
that we love, and hate, with all the energy of our hearts; that all our
evil passions, and sometimes our good feelings, prevail; for the miser,
over his cups, may become generous; the barbarous, humane; and the man
who has perpetrated the most reckless crimes, will weep with apparent
anguish over ideal woes. Were it possible to ascertain the influence of
intemperance in the many duels that have been fought, it would doubtless
appear that many of these fatal quarrels would never have taken place in
a sober society.
It is also to be observed, that duels, when of constant recurrence,
became the subject of general conversation, and duels, like suicide,
bear a fashionably contagious character, which spreads widely in
society, and then the most mistaken of criminals fancies that he must
also avenge certain wrongs, or rid himself of an uncertain life. The one
feels a pleasure in killing a supposed enemy, and the other seeks a
riddance from pain by killing himself. The one thinks that he must
establish a character of courage, not to be despised by society, and the
suicide bids farewell to a society which he disgraces; whereas, neither
the one nor the other in these desperate acts displays a particle of
true courage.