The History of Duelling. Vol. 2 (of 2) — John Stuart Mill — John Shaqi
The History of Duelling. Vol. 2 (of 2)
John Stuart Mill · en
In the present state of society, insults to women are comparatively
rare; and indeed, unless a person, who in the slightest degree claims
the character of a gentleman, is labouring under the brutalizing
influence of liquor, it is scarcely possible to imagine how he can so
far forget every manly attribute as to offend a being whom nature has
placed under our protection, and to whose assistance, when in danger, we
rush instinctively. This cause of duelling is therefore seldom noticed.
Leaving off the wearing of swords, as I have already observed, rendered
bloody frays less frequent; but at the same time, the adoption of
pistols gave a much more serious complexion to a hostile meeting. It is
true, that comparatively few shots tell, but the wounds of fire-arms are
in general more dangerous than those inflicted by a rapier. Skill in
fencing might be of considerable advantage to a good swordsman; but it
is also a well-known fact, that a man who has science in fencing, can
not only parry a thrust, but inflict a mortal wound on one less
dexterous. Moreover, when what was called the _first blood_ was drawn,
however trifling the scratch, the seconds generally interposed. It may
be therefore concluded, that as mankind is taught to think soberly, the
danger of a duel may deter many from rashly running its chance.
In recording the many duels that took place during this reign, several
of them may appear trivial, and not worthy of notice, yet, as the
history of duelling, as I have already said, may be considered as the
mirror of the manners and prevalent ideas of the day, these
circumstances, however insignificant, are of importance, inasmuch as
they show both the progress and the gradual decline of this detestable
practice; they will tend also to point out those cases where the most
punctilious should have been amply satisfied with an apology, and where
the seconds were guilty of murder, by allowing their principals to
proceed to the fatal extremity of sending life in pursuit of the phantom
misnamed _Honour._
BETWEEN LORD KILMAURS AND A FRENCH OFFICER,
May 1765.
Although this meeting took place at Marseilles; yet, as being one highly
characteristic of the times, it may be properly considered here.