The Life of a Foxhound — John Stuart Mill — John Shaqi
The Life of a Foxhound
John Stuart Mill · en
“Personal appearance,” observed Mrs. Sykes to Will, one evening,
sitting in a cozy corner of his parlour, in a dreamy, winking, blinking
state, lulled by the influence of a blazing yule log--“personal
appearance,” repeated she, somewhat louder, “is necessary for personal
respect; and unless we look as if we respected ourselves, it’s
unreasonable to suppose that other people will go for to respect us.
We must best know,” continued she, “our own in’ards; and if we show,
by our out’ards, that they’re all gammon and bacon, rest assured they
won’t pass as the _best_ of chitlins.”
And was it for this, then--this worldly object--that Mrs. Sykes might
be seen on every succeeding Sunday, volume in hand, walking with
stately and measured tread along the path leading to the gray-mossed
and ivy-twined church? Was it for this that the ribbed silk dress
and most treasured bonnet were donned on the seventh day, when the
likelihood was great of many eyes beholding them? Was it for this that,
from the bright buckle in her shoe to the topmost ribbon stuck jauntily
to flutter in the breeze, Mrs. Sykes evinced such elaborate taste and
dainty care? Mrs. Sykes, like countless hosts of her betters, would
have been justly indignant had such prying interrogatories been put to
her for solution, however blandly they might have been effected; and
as there is no confession on her part, and no justifiable ground for
speculation in the replies, they must remain unanswered to the end of
time.
Tom Holt, the first whipper-in, and consequently second in command, was
a very different _genus homo_ to our huntsman. As may already have
been learned from his expressed opinions and sentiments, he possessed
strange quirks and notions, and, to use his own graphic description of
his imaginary pedigree, might have been “a cross between a bull-dog
and a flat iron.” Much nice sophism might be used to support the
poetical origin of Tom Holt; but if volumes were written to define his
allegory more clearly, the end could not be more satisfactorily arrived
at than by briefly saying, “it can far more easily be conceived than
described.” Tom was a reflective man; he could not see an infant in its
mother’s arms without the endeavour to picture to his vivid imagination
how it would look when blear-eyed with age. A piece of thistle-down,
whirling here and there, now catching in a bramble, and then skimming
along in its varied, uncertain course, would make him think of “cause
and effect” for an hour. A dew-drop, a feather in the air, a film of
gossamer, often set Tom Holt “a-thinking” for the livelong day. He was
a dreamer, and had more strange fantasies, with eyes wide and staring
open, than a thousand such will-o’-the wisps fanned by the fairies’
midwife, Queen Mab. And yet Tom Holt, although his face was pale and
thin, and his dark hazel eyes always bore a serious look, enjoyed right
heartily his duties, and all thereunto pertaining. He studied the