The Miller in Eighteenth-Century Virginia: An Account of Mills & the Craft of Milling, as Well as a Description of the Windmill near the Palace in Williamsburg — John Stuart Mill — John Shaqi
The Miller in Eighteenth-Century Virginia: An Account of Mills & the Craft of Milling, as Well as a Description of the Windmill near the Palace in Williamsburg
John Stuart Mill · en
Actually by 1621 the first mill had been put up by Governor Yeardley on
his own plantation near the falls of the James River. But it was a
windmill, not a watermill, and for at least four years seems to have
been the sole facility of its kind in the whole coastal wilderness of
North America.
The first mill in the Massachusetts Bay colony, where waterfalls were
considerably more frequent and closer to the coast than in tidewater
Virginia, was also a windmill, built in 1631. In New Amsterdam the first
mill, again a windmill, was erected in 1632. In Virginia by 1649 there
were nine mills in operation, four windmills and five watermills, and
the number had grown as fast or faster in other areas.
Exposed coastal areas on Cape Cod, around Newport, Rhode Island, and on
the eastern end of Long Island, as well as on the Eastern Shore of
Maryland, the Carolinas, and Virginia were found especially well adapted
to windmills. Massachusetts in particular saw a rapid rise in milling.
It was there, under the aegis of John Pearson, “the father of the
milling industry,” that commercial milling got its early start in
America.
At somewhat later stages a similar boom in milling activity took place
in New Netherland, New Sweden, and their successor English colonies. For
several decades New York held the crown as the wheat-growing,
grist-milling, and flour-exporting capital of the New World, only to be
superseded about 1700 by Pennsylvania.
_WHERE TOBACCO WAS KING_
In Maryland and Virginia, where tobacco was the king-sized money crop,
grist-milling developed along a somewhat different path. Throughout the
seventeenth and well into the eighteenth century the tobacco colonists
grew wheat and corn for home consumption only. And “home consumption” in
most instances meant literally that. The typical plantation, an almost
self-sufficient community in many ways, raised wheat enough for the
owner’s family and sufficient corn to feed the slaves and animals.
In his report of 1724, called _The Present State of Virginia_, Hugh
Jones avowed that:
As for grinding Corn, &c. they have good mills upon the Runs and
Creeks; besides Hand-Mills, Wind-Mills, and the Indian invention of
pounding Hommony in Mortars burnt in the Stump of a Tree, with a Log,
for a Pestle, hanging at the End of a Pole, fixed like the Pole of a
Lave.
Often the planter owned and operated a grist mill for his own use and
that of the neighboring small farmers. William Fitzhugh, for example,
described his fully equipped layout as including, in 1686, “a good water
Grist miln, whose tole I find sufficient to find my own family with
wheat & Indian corn for our necessitys and occasions.” Fitzhugh thus
needed to grow no grain of his own to feed his “family,” an expression
that to him included not only the white indentured servants who lived
and worked on the plantation, but also his twenty-nine slaves.