The old South : $b A monograph — John Stuart Mill — John Shaqi
The old South : $b A monograph
John Stuart Mill · en
Earlier in these pages I raised the question as to why the South,
once so potent in national council and leadership, was now become
the mere servant of the national Democratic party, so much so
that the recognized Sir Oracle of Republicanism and mouthpiece of
his excellency the President is led to remind us, while a guest on
Southern soil, of our pristine place and power, and to admonish
us, in the frankness of an open and worthy foeman, to quit playing
the role of lackey in national politics, and to put forth as of
yore our own home-grown statesmen for national positions of highest
honor and service, and to do all in our might again to restore the
lost political prestige of the South. Come from whomsoever it may,
Republican or Democrat, Grosvenor or Grant—for the latter before
his death held like view with the former—the advice is well given
and the point well taken. But when once the renaissance begins, I
think the Augean stable of latter-day politics, even in the New
South, will need another Hercules to purify it. Take, for instance,
this statement from a recent issue of a great Southern newspaper:
“The four candidates for railroad commissioner expended a total of
$14,940.80 on their campaign expenses, Mr. ——, who was nominated,
leading with $10,522.80. The twelve candidates for the Supreme
Court paid out $7,133.34. Sixteen Congressional candidates expended
$15,965.88.”
In the _Independent_ of recent date a leading Democratic manufacturer
of New Jersey, under manifestly strong grievance, recites his
experiences as a delegate in the State Democratic Convention, in
which a vigorous effort was made, as in other Democratic Conventions,
to force the indorsement of an unclean aspirant to the highest office
of the republic. The article I cite is an evident instance of pot and
kettle, but it sets in bold relief the straits and methods to which
the dominating wing of the party of Jefferson and Jackson has been
reduced, certainly in some of the Northern if not of the Southern
States. I quote the closing paragraph of the article as a faithful
picture of recent political happenings:
What are the means used by the bosses? First, corrupted judges
at the primaries and bulldozing tactics there. Secondly, a
brow-beating county and delegation chairman, with his attendant
thugs. Thirdly, a properly managed credentials committee, with
arrangements made beforehand, so that there will be contests and
the contests decided their way. Fourthly, a tactful chairman, who
will have fine presence, be a hypocrite and pretend to fairness,
but never recognize any but machine men. Fifthly, the presence of
the boss, with his ever-ready check book and a fine knowledge of
men to know what he must do to win his way with them.