The Plébiscite; or, A Miller's Story of the War: By One of the 7,500,000 Who Voted "Yes" — John Stuart Mill — John Shaqi
The Plébiscite; or, A Miller's Story of the War: By One of the 7,500,000 Who Voted "Yes"
John Stuart Mill · en
Produced by Al Haines
[Frontispiece: HE ROBBED YOU, THAT'S ALL.]
HISTORICAL ROMANCES OF FRANCE
THE PLEBISCITE
OR
A MILLER'S STORY OF THE WAR
BY ONE OF THE 7,500,000 WHO VOTED "YES"
TRANSLATED FROM THE FRENCH OF
ERCKMANN-CHATRIAN
ILLUSTRATED
CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS
NEW YORK::::::::::::::::::::::1911
COPYRIGHT, 1889, 1898
CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS
ILLUSTRATIONS
"_He robbed you, that's all_" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _Frontispiece_
"_The grapeshot has mown them down. There are none left_"
_They drew two poor old men from their cellar_
_There he was, leaning forward to listen_
"_Good-by, my father! Good-by, my mother!_"
INTRODUCTORY NOTE
The present volume serves to emphasize the important connection, so
generally now lost sight of, between the _plebiscite_ of 1870 in France
and the war with Prussia which so speedily followed. Under the
administration of Ollivier, which promised an attractive extension of
popular liberties, it will be remembered, the _plebiscitum_ of the
Roman Constitution was borrowed, to give an air of popular approval to
the strongly attacked Imperial regime by taking the sense of the people
through universal suffrage as to the continuance of the Imperial
authority on its then existing basis. Of the web of chicane and
corruption by which the election was brought out an overwhelming
triumph for Imperialism, MM. Erckmann-Chatrian give a clearer and more
impressive notion in this book than could be obtained from entire
volumes of parliamentary reports and whole files of newspapers. But
they make it especially clear how the people were persuaded to return a
majority of "yeses" so enormous as to make it impossible to account for
it on the theory of mere corruption and chicane. It is evident from
this narrative that the people were made to believe that the Empire
meant peace abroad and freedom from foreign complications then
threatening, as well as tranquillity at home, and that therefore one of
the profoundest instincts of twenty millions of peasantry was utilized
in order to be subsequently betrayed.