The training of teachers in the United States of America — John Stuart Mill — John Shaqi
The training of teachers in the United States of America
John Stuart Mill · en
should be borne in mind that these examinations are only in school
subjects.
The fact that in a State such as Massachusetts the qualifications of
teachers in the High and Latin Schools of Boston is stated merely as
“Education at some respectable college of good standing,” shows that
the necessity for the professional training of teachers for higher
or secondary schools is not at present fully recognised. Until the
last few years, no Institution especially devoted to the training
of secondary teachers existed in the eastern States, and those who
wished to prepare themselves for the teaching of the higher branches
of subjects had no other means of training than that offered in the
Normal Schools. At Worcester and Bridgewater, College and University
graduates may take the pedagogical course as special students, and so
prepare for teaching in the higher schools. At the Indiana and Illinois
Normal Schools, and in other places, there are courses of study chiefly
or entirely professional, for college or university graduates, if such
present themselves. At Albany, too, where the standard of admission is
high, many of the students prepare for work in the secondary schools.
On the whole, however, the number of special students preparing for
higher work in the Normal Schools is very small. In 1891-1892, the
Southern Illinois Normal University had only six special students, the
Terre-Haute Normal School, Indiana, only four; and we find in the
eastern States generally that the Normal Schools take very little part
in the training of secondary teachers. For the most part Normal School
students are found only in the lower grades of public schools; and
college graduates, even though untrained, are preferred as teachers in
High Schools, good private schools and academies.