The Women's Victory—and After: Personal Reminiscences, 1911-1918 — John Stuart Mill — John Shaqi
The Women's Victory—and After: Personal Reminiscences, 1911-1918
John Stuart Mill · en
public against the suffrage and the suffragists, and to produce the
impression that we were people who delighted in the circulation of
vile literature. This went on for about a fortnight, when I happened
to have the opportunity of a conversation, on an entirely different
subject, with a highly placed officer of the Government, a member of
the House of Lords. While I was talking to him on the subject on which
I had come to see him, it occurred to me to speak to him also about
the little plot to discredit the suffrage movement in which the Home
Secretary was playing the leading rôle. "Is it with your knowledge
and consent, Lord ——," I asked, "that your colleague, Mr. McKenna, is
keeping before the public as long as he possibly can the interesting
fact that he is unable to make up his mind whether or not to prosecute
me and the N.U.W.S.S., of which I am President, for circulating obscene
literature? Three questions have already been asked on this subject in
the House of Commons within the last eleven days, and it is impossible
to say how many more times the point will be discussed in the House
and reported in every paper in Great Britain."[3] I also told him
something of Dr. Louisa Martindale, her high character and first-rate
professional position, and also (rather maliciously on my part) that
her family were very active and highly esteemed Liberals in Sussex, and
that gratuitous insults to them would be keenly resented, and might
possibly even have a political reaction. He appeared startled, and, as
far as I could gather, had had no previous knowledge of what had been
going on. He said very little, and promised me nothing. But from that
date the attack upon Dr. Martindale, her book, and the N.U.W.S.S.,
entirely ceased. The incident did not increase our esteem for the
antisuffrage party in the House of Commons. A few months later I had
proof, if proof were needed, that the Government did not seriously
believe me to be a person capable of circulating obscene literature,
for I was invited by the Government to become a member of the Royal
Commission on Venereal Disease, a position which could certainly not
have been offered if the Government had shared Mr. McKenna's doubts as
to my character. I was not able to accept the invitation because my
suffrage work entirely absorbed me, and I saw no prospect of its claims
becoming less urgent in the near future.
The Session of 1912 dragged its interminable length along. It lasted
for thirteen months, from January, 1912, to January, 1913, both
inclusive. The Government were slow in producing their Reform Bill.
In May, however, it was brought forward, and it did not come up for
Second Reading until July 12th, 1912. In the Second Reading debate Mr.
Asquith, Prime Minister and Leader of the House, expressed himself as
follows: