The Women's Victory—and After: Personal Reminiscences, 1911-1918 — John Stuart Mill — John Shaqi
The Women's Victory—and After: Personal Reminiscences, 1911-1918
John Stuart Mill · en
It was not enough for us to put on record our intention of doing our
best to strengthen the position of the Labour Party at by-elections;
we also made plans to help Labour members to defend their seats at the
time of a general election. A special committee was formed to organize
the support of Labour candidates, and to raise a sum of money for this
purpose. It was thus that the Election Fighting Fund was inaugurated
in May, 1912. Two thousand pounds was at once subscribed in the room,
before any special appeal had been made; and during the short time
between the starting of the fund and the outbreak of the European War
it was sufficiently replenished by constant gifts from our own members
to enable us to keep up the work with vigour and efficiency. The fund
had not been a month in existence before it was used in support of the
Labour candidate at the Holmfirth by-election; and there were shortly
afterwards three other by-elections—at Hanley, Crewe, and Midlothian—at
which the Election Fighting Fund and its band of organizers and
speakers were used in support of Labour candidates. We were
authoritatively assured that the Liberals knew that they would have
held the seats at Crewe and Midlothian had the attitude of their party
been satisfactory on women's suffrage. In 1913 the E.F.F. work was put
into operation at Houghton-le-Spring, Keighley, and Lanark; and in 1914
in North-West Durham, Leith Burghs, and North-East Derbyshire. There
were therefore ten elections in all during the almost exactly two years
in which the E.F.F. policy was vigorously worked by the N.U.W.S.S.,
and during which six seats, counting for twelve votes in a division,
were transferred from the Liberal to the Conservative side of the
House. We were very well satisfied by these results, although of course
disappointed that no Labour candidate had won a seat: in every case,
however, the number of votes recorded for Labour had greatly increased.
We had a splendid band of first-class speakers and organizers to
work in each constituency; and at each successive election the whole
place rang with women's suffrage and our meetings were crowded and
enthusiastic—very often much more crowded and enthusiastic than
those of the candidates. In the first election the Liberal against
whom we had worked got in, but his majority was reduced to less than
half what it had been at the last contest. The next election was less
satisfactory; but at the third, a seat formerly held by a Liberal
by a majority of 1,704 was gained by a Conservative supporter of
suffrage, and it was generally acknowledged in the district that the
vigorous help of the N.U.W.S.S. was the deciding factor in defeating
the Liberal candidate. The Labour candidate polled nearly double the
number of votes which his party had secured at the last three-cornered
contest, and consequently was the means of securing the defeat of the
Government candidate. Our success at Crewe was followed by a still more