Thunder and Lightning — John Stuart Mill — John Shaqi
Thunder and Lightning
John Stuart Mill · en
These are cases of destruction on a large scale, but we can give
parallel cases where the terrible fluid seems only to amuse itself.
In fact, some people appear to enjoy the privilege of particularly
attracting lightning, and of frequently receiving its visits without
suffering much from its reiterated attacks.
They say that Mithridates was twice touched by lightning. The first
stroke was when he was in his cradle, his swaddling clothes were
singed, and the scar of a burn which he received on his forehead was
covered with hair afterwards.
According to the Abbé Richard, a lady, who lived in a château on an
elevation near Bourgogne, saw the lightning several times enter her
room, divide itself into sparks of different sizes, of which the
greater part attached themselves to her clothes without burning them,
and left livid traces on her arms and even on her thighs. She said,
when speaking on this subject, that thunder had never done her more
harm than to whip her two or three times, though it fell pretty often
on her château.
There seems to be a sort of relative immunity in women and children.
These are seldom struck. We have even several examples of children
remaining safe and sound in the arms of their mothers who are struck.
Fracastor's mother had her child to her breast when she was struck by
lightning. The child itself was spared.
In August, 1853, at Georgetown (Essex), Mrs. Russel, wife of the
Protestant minister, was killed by lightning, while a small child
which she had in her arms was unhurt.
It would seem as if lightning pitied the feeble--the women and
children.
We hear of cases where people were struck several times during the
same storm without succumbing to its manifold attacks.
"In two similar situations," says Arago, "one man, according to the
nature of his constitution, runs more risk than another. There are
some exceptional people who are not conductors to the fulminating
matter, and who neither receive nor pass on a shock. As a rule, they
must be ranked among the non-conductor bodies that the lightning
respects, or, at least, that it strikes rarely. Such decided
differences could not exist without there being finer shades. Thus
each degree of conductibility corresponds during the time of a storm
to a certain degree of danger. The man who conducts like a metal will
be struck as often as a metal, while the man who cuts off the
communication in the chain, will have almost as little to fear as if
he were made of glass or resin. Between these limits there will be
found individuals whom lightning might strike as it would strike wood,
stones, etc. Thus, in the phenomena of lightning, everything does not
depend on the place that a man may occupy; his physical constitution
will have something to do with it."
The phantasmagoria of lightning leaves us perplexed. All these
observations are extraordinary and very disconcerting. The facts
contradict each other, and lead us to no actual conclusion.