Trial of Jane Leigh Perrot, at Taunton Assizes, on Saturday the 29th day of March, 1800; charged with stealing a card of lace, in the shop of Elizabeth Gregory, haberdasher & milliner, of the city of Bath — John Stuart Mill — John Shaqi
Trial of Jane Leigh Perrot, at Taunton Assizes, on Saturday the 29th day of March, 1800; charged with stealing a card of lace, in the shop of Elizabeth Gregory, haberdasher & milliner, of the city of Bath
John Stuart Mill · en
Although you were apprenticed to Mr. Lambe you served Miss Gregory
always.
EXAMINED BY JUDGE LAWRENCE.
She saw him put only the black lace into the parcel, she is sure of
this, she was looking at him.
Mrs. Perrott, being called on for her defence, then spoke.
_“As my counsel are not permitted to make any observation on my
case, I will say a few words myself. Placed in a situation the most
affluent with a supply so ample, that I was left rich, after every
wish was gratified, blessed with the affections of the most generous
of husbands, what inducement could I have to commit such a crime?
depraved indeed must that mind be, that under such circumstances could
be capable of it; you will hear from my noble and truly respectable
friends, what has been my conduct and character for many years;
you will hear what has been and still is their opinion of me, can
you suppose that disposition so totally altered, as to lose all
recollection of the situation held in society, to hazard for this
meanness, my welfare and reputation, or to endanger the health and
peace of a husband I would die for; you have heard their evidence
against me, I shall make no comments upon it, I shall leave that task
where I am confident it will be exercised with justice & mercy, I
know my own oath is inadmissable, but I call that God, whom we all
acknowledge and adore, to attest that I am innocent, and may he or you
punish me, as I speak truth or false in denying it, call that God to
witness, that I did not know I had that lace in my possession, nor did
I know it, when Miss Gregory accosted me in the Street; I have nothing
more to say.”_
JOHN CROUT, EXAMINED BY MR. BOND.
Knows Filby & his brother, he has more than once or twice done business
at Crout’s house, supposes he was a haberdasher.
CROSS EXAMINED, BY MR. GIBBS.
Has seen him, and had dealings with him, since 1793, Charles Filby
might not have been more than once or twice.
MISS BLAGRAVE, EXAMINED BY MR. DALLAS.
Was at Bath in August last, in September went to Gregory’s shop to buy
a veil, the 19th. of September, she bought the veil from Filby, she
went home, and on opening the parcel, she found two in the said parcel,
next day she went to the shop to return the veil, she asked him if he
recollected she bought the veil the day before, he said yes, she told
him he had put up two, he said he was obliged to her, but he had not
missed it.
CROSS-EXAMINED, BY MR. GIBBS.
Was not acquainted with Mrs. P. till she came here, she carried back
the veil the next morning, when he said he was obliged to her, but she
had never been accus’d by the people of the shop, for taking it.
MARY KENT, EXAMINED BY MR. JEKYLL.