Overtones, a book of temperaments : $b Richard Strauss, Parsifal, Verdi, Balzac, Flaubert, Nietzsche, and Turgénieff — Nietzsche — John Shaqi
Overtones, a book of temperaments : $b Richard Strauss, Parsifal, Verdi, Balzac, Flaubert, Nietzsche, and Turgénieff
Nietzsche · en
In W. B. Yeats’s Ideas of Good and Evil, there appears this
characteristic passage: “Have not poetry and music arisen, as
it seems, out of the sounds the enchanters made to help their
imagination to enchant, to charm, to bind with a spell themselves
and the passers-by? These very words, a chief part of all praises of
music or poetry, still cry to us their origin.” The Irish mystic
poet is writing of magic, and I cannot help applying his words to
Richard Strauss, who is the initiator of new art. After hearing
his Till Eulenspiegel conducted by the composer, I was more than
ever impressed by the idea that Strauss is diverting music into
psychologic channels, moulding its plastic forms into shapes that are
really vital, so intense is their personal appeal. Since primitive
man howled his lays to the moon, the art of music has become in
every age more and more definitive; even the classic masters were
not content to play alone with tonal arabesques, but sought to
impress upon their bars a definite mood. In Beethoven the passion
for articulating his meanings literally re-created music. When
Wagner found that he had nothing new to say, he resorted to an old
device—he wedded his music to words. Richard Strauss has now taken
up the chain, the last links of which were so patiently forged by
Franz Liszt. He has at his command all the old enchantments of music;
he can woo and ravish the ear and command the tempests; but this is
not enough. He would have his message still more articulate. He is
a thinker, a philosopher as well as a poet, and deeply religious in
the cosmical sense; he purposes no less a task than the complete
subjugation of men’s imagination. Notes, phrases, groups, movements,
masses of tone are no longer merely sensuous symbols, but the actual
symbols of a language; we must hasten to learn the new speech, which
relates in wonderful tones wonderful things. Tschaïkowsky aimed at
this definiteness, but his passionate, emotional nature clouded the
workings of his intellect. Strauss, too, has had the seven devils of
sensuality in his mansion, but has exorcised them by sheer force of
a great spiritual nature—the man is a spiritualist, a seer in the
broader meanings of these much-worn terms. The vision of approaching
death in his Don Quixote could have been conceived only by one for
whom life and the universe itself were symbols, the living garment by
which we apprehend the Deity.