Platonism in English poetry of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries
Plato · en
At this point Vaughan ends his catalogue of human types and comments
upon the unwillingness of the many to soar up into the ring by the aid
of the wing.
“Yet some, who all this while did weep and sing,
And sing, and weep, soar’d up into the ring;
But most would use no wing.
O fools—said I—thus to prefer dark night
Before true light!
To live in grots and caves, and hate the day
Because it shows the way;
The way, which from this dead and dark abode
Leads up to God.”
Spenser finds his suggestion of the eternal in life, not in a
consciousness of a past existence, but in a conception of the world of
matter built up in accordance with the Platonic doctrine of stability of
the substance amid the flux of changing forms. This conception of the
world is explained by him in his description of the “Garden of Adonis”
in the “Faerie Queene” and in his “Two Cantos of Mutabilitie.”
The conception of matter which Spenser teaches is the doctrine of
Plotinus expressed in accordance with the account of flux and stability
of natural phenomena explained by Plato in the “Timæus.” According to
Plotinus matter is an indestructible “subject” of forms which endures
through all the various changes which it is constantly undergoing, and
this unchanging something is never destroyed. (“Enneads,” II. iv. 6.) In
the “Timæus” Plato had outlined a theory of flux with which this
doctrine of the indestructibility of matter could be easily harmonized.
In his discussion of the world of natural phenomena he distinguishes
three natures, as he calls them, and likens them to a father, a child,
and a mother. “For the present,” he says in the “Timæus” (50), “we have
only to conceive of three natures: first, that which is in process of
generation; secondly, that in which the generation takes place; and
thirdly, that of which the thing generated is a resemblance. And we may
liken the receiving principle to a mother, and the source or spring to a
father, and the intermediate nature to a child.” According to this piece
of poetic imagery he describes the various manifestations of matter in
the outward world. The elements are constantly changing in and out of
one another and have in them nothing permanent. They cannot be called
“this” or “that,” but only “such.” Only the receiving principle, the
universal nature, “that must be always called the same; for while
receiving all things, she never departs at all from her own nature, and
never in any way or at any time assumes a form like that of any of the
things which enter into her; she is the natural recipient of all
impressions, and is stirred and informed by them, and appears different
from time to time by reason of them.” (“Timæus,” 50.)