The dialogues of Plato in five volumes, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Translated into English with analyses and introductions
Plato · en
logical division? Are we not at the same time describing them both in
superlatives, only that we may satisfy the demands of rhetoric? What
is that pain which does not become deadened after a thousand years? or
what is the nature of that pleasure or happiness which never wearies by
monotony? Earthly pleasures and pains are short in proportion as they
are keen; of any others which are both intense and lasting we have no
experience, and can form no idea. The words or figures of speech which we
use are not consistent with themselves. For are we not imagining Heaven
under the similitude of a church, and Hell as a prison, or perhaps a
madhouse or chamber of horrors? And yet to beings constituted as we are,
the monotony of singing psalms would be as great an infliction as the
pains of hell, and might be even pleasantly interrupted by them. Where
are the actions worthy of rewards greater than those which are conferred
on the greatest benefactors of mankind? And where are the crimes which
according to Plato’s merciful reckoning,—more merciful, at any rate,
than the eternal damnation of so-called Christian teachers,—for every
ten years in this life deserve a hundred of punishment in the life to
come? We should be ready to die of pity if we could see the least of the
sufferings which the writers of Infernos and Purgatorios have attributed
to the damned. Yet these joys and terrors seem hardly to exercise an
appreciable influence over the lives of men. The wicked man when old, is
not, as Plato supposes (Rep. i. 330 D, E), more agitated by the terrors
of another world when he is nearer to them, nor the good in an ecstasy at
the joys of which he is soon to be the partaker. Age numbs the sense of
both worlds; and the habit of life is strongest in death. Even the dying
mother is dreaming of her lost children as they were forty or fifty years
before, ‘pattering over the boards,’ not of reunion with them in another
state of being. Most persons when the last hour comes are resigned to the
order of nature and the will of God. They are not thinking of Dante’s
Inferno or Paradiso, or of the Pilgrim’s Progress. Heaven and hell are
not realities to them, but words or ideas; the outward symbols of some
great mystery, they hardly know what. Many noble poems and pictures have
been suggested by the traditional representations of them, which have
been fixed in forms of art and can no longer be altered. Many sermons
have been filled with descriptions of celestial or infernal mansions. But
hardly even in childhood did the thought of heaven and hell supply the
motives of our actions, or at any time seriously affect the substance of
our belief.
[Sidenote: _The immortality of the soul._]