The dialogues of Plato in five volumes, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Translated into English with analyses and introductions — Plato — John Shaqi
The dialogues of Plato in five volumes, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Translated into English with analyses and introductions
Plato · en
[Sidenote: The soul in herself must perceive things in themselves.]
And when real philosophers consider all these things, will
they not be led to make a reflection which they will express
in words something like the following? ‘Have we not found,’
they will say, ‘a path of thought which seems to bring us and
our argument to the conclusion, that while we are in the
body, and while the soul is infected with the evils of the body,
our desire will not be satisfied? and our desire is of the truth.
For the body is a source of endless trouble to us by reason of
the mere requirement of food; and is liable also to diseases
which overtake and impede us in the search after true being:
it fills us full of loves, and lusts, and fears, and fancies of all
kinds, and endless foolery, and in fact, as men say, takes
away from us the power of thinking at all. Whence come
wars, and fightings, and factions? whence but from the body
and the lusts of the body? Wars are occasioned by the love
of money, and money has to be acquired for the sake and in
the service of the body; and by reason of all these impediments
we have no time to give to philosophy; and, last and
worst of all, even if we are at leisure and betake ourselves to
some speculation, the body is always breaking in upon us,
causing turmoil and confusion in our enquiries, and so
amazing us that we are prevented from seeing the truth.
It has been proved to us by experience that if we would have
pure knowledge of anything we must be quit of the body—the
soul in herself must behold things in themselves: and
then we shall attain the wisdom which we desire, and of
which we say that we are lovers; not while we live, but after
death; for if while in company with the body, the soul
cannot have pure knowledge, one of two things follows—either
knowledge is not to be attained at all, or, if at all, after
death. For then, and not till then, the soul will be parted 67
from the body and exist in herself alone. In this present
life, I reckon that we make the nearest approach to knowledge
when we have the least possible intercourse or communion
with the body, and are not surfeited with the bodily
nature, but keep ourselves pure until the hour when God
himself is pleased to release us. And thus having got rid of
the foolishness of the body we shall be pure and hold converse
with the pure, and know of ourselves the clear light
everywhere, which is no other than the light of truth.’ For
the impure are not permitted to approach the pure. These
are the sort of words, Simmias, which the true lovers of
knowledge cannot help saying to one another, and thinking.
You would agree; would you not?
[Sidenote: _The hope of the departing soul._]
Undoubtedly, Socrates.