The dialogues of Plato in five volumes, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Translated into English with analyses and introductions — Plato — John Shaqi
The dialogues of Plato in five volumes, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Translated into English with analyses and introductions
Plato · en
_Soc._ And if any one asks us what sort of persuasion, and
about what,—we shall answer, persuasion which teaches the
quantity of odd and even; and we shall be able to show that
all the other arts of which we were just now speaking are 454
artificers of persuasion, and of what sort, and about what.
_Gor._ Very true.
_Soc._ Then rhetoric is not the only artificer of persuasion?
_Gor._ True.
[Sidenote: _Knowledge and belief._]
[Sidenote: Of what persuasion is rhetoric the artificer?]
_Soc._ Seeing, then, that not only rhetoric works by persuasion,
but that other arts do the same, as in the case of
the painter, a question has arisen which is a very fair one:
Of what persuasion is rhetoric the artificer, and about what?—is
not that a fair way of putting the question?
_Gor._ I think so.
_Soc._ Then, if you approve the question, Gorgias, what is
the answer?
[Sidenote: Of persuasion in the courts and assemblies about the just and
unjust.]
_Gor._ I answer, Socrates, that rhetoric is the art of persuasion
in courts of law and other assemblies, as I was just
now saying, and about the just and unjust.
_Soc._ And that, Gorgias, was what I was suspecting to be
your notion; yet I would not have you wonder if by-and-by
I am found repeating a seemingly plain question; for I ask
not in order to confute you, but as I was saying that the
argument may proceed consecutively, and that we may not
get the habit of anticipating and suspecting the meaning of
one another’s words; I would have you develope your own
views in your own way, whatever may be your hypothesis.
_Gor._ I think that you are quite right, Socrates.
_Soc._ Then let me raise another question; there is such
a thing as ‘having learned’?
_Gor._ Yes.
_Soc._ And there is also ‘having believed’?
_Gor._ Yes.
[Sidenote: Knowledge and belief are not the same things; for there may be
a false belief, but not a false knowledge.]
_Soc._ And is the ‘having learned’ the same as ‘having
believed,’ and are learning and belief the same things?
_Gor._ In my judgment, Socrates, they are not the same.
_Soc._ And your judgment is right, as you may ascertain in
this way:—If a person were to say to you, ‘Is there,
Gorgias, a false belief as well as a true?’—you would reply,
if I am not mistaken, that there is.
_Gor._ Yes.
_Soc._ Well, but is there a false knowledge as well as a
true?
_Gor._ No.
_Soc._ No, indeed; and this again proves that knowledge
and belief differ.
_Gor._ Very true.
_Soc._ And yet those who have learned as well as those
who have believed are persuaded?
[Sidenote: _What do we really mean concerning rhetoric?_]
_Gor._ Just so.
_Soc._ Shall we then assume two sorts of persuasion,—one
which is the source of belief without knowledge, as the other
is of knowledge?