The dialogues of Plato in five volumes, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Translated into English with analyses and introductions
Plato · en
_Euth._ I am amused, Socrates, at your making a distinction
between one who is a relation and one who is not a relation;
for surely the pollution is the same in either case, if you
knowingly associate with the murderer when you ought to
clear yourself and him by proceeding against him. The real
question is whether the murdered man has been justly slain.
If justly, then your duty is to let the matter alone; but if
unjustly, then even if the murderer lives under the same roof
with you and eats at the same table, proceed against him.
Now the man who is dead was a poor dependant of mine who
worked for us as a field labourer on our farm in Naxos, and
one day in a fit of drunken passion he got into a quarrel with
one of our domestic servants and slew him. My father bound
him hand and foot and threw him into a ditch, and then sent
to Athens to ask of a diviner what he should do with him.
Meanwhile he never attended to him and took no care about
him, for he regarded him as a murderer; and thought that no
great harm would be done even if he did die. Now this was
just what happened. For such was the effect of cold and
hunger and chains upon him, that before the messenger
returned from the diviner, he was dead. And my father and
family are angry with me for taking the part of the murderer
and prosecuting my father. They say that he did not kill
him, and that if he did, the dead man was but a murderer,
and I ought not to take any notice, for that a son is impious
who prosecutes a father. Which shows, Socrates, how little
they know what the gods think about piety and impiety.
_Soc._ Good heavens, Euthyphro! and is your knowledge of
religion and of things pious and impious so very exact, that,
supposing the circumstances to be as you state them, you are
not afraid lest you too may be doing an impious thing in
bringing an action against your father?
_Euth._ The best of Euthyphro, and that which distinguishes
him, Socrates, from other men, is his exact knowledge of all 5
such matters. What should I be good for without it?
[Sidenote: Socrates, who is accused of false theology, thinks that he
cannot do better than become the disciple of so great a theologian as
Euthyphro.]