The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elements
Plato · en
But Proclus, despising the schools of the rhetoricians, though they
very much desired his association, as if he had come for that very
purpose, met with the prince of philosophers Syrianus[52], the son of
Philoxenus. At that time too, Lachares was in the same company, a man
much conversant in philosophy, and the companion of Syrianus in his
study, but in eloquence he was in as great admiration as Homer in the
poetic art. He then was, as I have said, present at the same time. But
it was now the evening twilight, and while they were engaged in mutual
converse, the sun sate, and the moon made her first appearance after
her change: wherefore, having saluted the stranger, they endeavoured to
dismiss him, as being a young man, from their company, that they might
adore the goddess apart. But he not having proceeded far, beheld also
the moon appearing from the same house, and laying aside his sandals,
in their presence saluted the goddess. Here Lachares, admiring the
confidence of the youth, said, speaking to Syrianus, “This is what
Plato[53] divinely affirms of great geniuses; that they either produce
great good, or its contrary.” And such, that I may mention a few out
of many, were the signatures of divine original, which happened to our
philosopher, on his first arrival at Athens.
But Syrianus brought him to the great Plutarch[54], the son of Nestor,
who, when he saw the young man, not yet twenty years old, and heard
of his love and desire of a philosophic life, he was much delighted,
and immediately made him a partaker of his philosophic study, though
his age almost forbade such an attempt; for he was then very old. He
therefore read to Proclus his commentary on Aristotle’s books on the
soul, and on the Phædo of Plato: and this great man exhorted him to
commit to writing what he heard, employing the ambition of the youth
as an instrument, by telling him, that if he completed those scholia,
they would be reported as the commentaries of Proclus. And as he
loved the youth very much on account of his inclination to the best
studies, he called him his son, and caused him to reside with him as a
domestic. But after he saw his temperance, with regard to animal food,
he exhorted him not to abstain from animals entirely, but to use them
so far as was necessary to the vital energies of the corporeal part. He
likewise gave the same advice to Syrianus, concerning the youth’s diet.
But he answered the old man, as that divine head (Proclus) informed
us: “Suffer him with that frugality to learn what I wish, and then, if
he pleases, he may die.” Such was the care of his masters respecting
him, in every concern. But the old man lived about two years after the
arrival of Proclus; and dying, commended the youth to his successor
Syrianus, as also his grandson Archiadas. But Syrianus, when he had
received Proclus as his pupil, not only much assisted him in learning,
but made him his domestic as to other concerns, and the companion of