The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elements — Plato — John Shaqi
The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elements
Plato · en
For as a triangular figure in the phantasy, is the
recipient of a triangular nature, or of triangle itself; so every three
units in opinion, receive the essential triad of the soul, and, by this
means, form a definite quantum.
In short, as in every being we may discern the resemblances of matter
and form, so in the pentad, or any other number, the five units, which
are the subject of participation, and the quantity of the number,
originate from the duad; but the form, that is the pentad itself, from
unity. For every form is an unity, which unites its subject quantity,
and connects it with its ideal species. It is, therefore, requisite
to understand, that the two principles of mathematical numbers are
resident in our souls, with which every mathematical number is
co-existent; I mean unity, comprehending in itself all the forms of
numbers, and which corresponds to unity in intellectual natures; and
the duad, endued with a generative power, of a formless nature, and of
infinite virtue; and which is called boundless, on account of its being
the image of never-failing and intelligible duality. Hence, the unity
of the soul, with a never-ceasing energy, continually distinguishes and
forms all the orderly processions of her numbers, suffers no vacuum
to intervene, and leaves no quantity formless and innumerable. Hence
too, no essential number of the soul, as for instance, the pentad,
is composed from substance and accident, as a white man; nor from
genus and difference, as man from animal and biped; nor again, from
five unities mutually touching each other, like a bundle of wood; nor
from things mixt, like water and wine, nor from things subsisting
by position, in the manner that stones compose a house; nor lastly,
does it subsist like things numerable; for it is not because they are
composed from indivisible units, that they possess any thing besides
units. For many points are indivisible, yet quantity is not produced
on this account; but because they participate of two natures, the one
corresponding to matter, and the other to form. Lastly, it is not
proper to say, that the number seven (and so of any other number), is
composed from the triad and the tetrad; for units, indeed, composed
with units, form a subject adapted to the reception of the heptad,
or the ideal and essential number seven; but the definite numerical
quantity seven, is formed from so many units, and the ideal heptad.
Hence, as the soul of the shipwright gives form to the timber, from her
inherent art; so the numerative soul, from the unity endued with the
relation of a principle which she possesses, gives form and subsistence
to all her inherent numbers. But there is this difference between the
two, that the shipwright’s art is not essential to our nature, and
requires manual operation, because it is conversant with sensible
matter; but the numerative art is essentially inherent in the soul,
and is therefore present with all men, and possesses an intellectual