The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elements — Plato — John Shaqi
The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elements
Plato · en
shall we find him supported by the profession? It is a well known fact,
that men formerly lived in the highest esteem by its propagation: it
is equally as notorious, that a man at present would starve by such an
attempt. Dare we assert, that the reason of this difference must be
ascribed to the greater liberality, and more philosophical spirit of
the present age? Shall we not rather say, that the period, in which
these ancient heroes lived, was the golden age of philosophy;--a
period so different from the present, as to appear fabulous on the
comparison? For mark the distinguishing characteristics of our
inferiority. The great object of ancient philosophy, was an accurate
speculation of principles and causes: but that of the modern, is a
confused investigation of effects. And if pursuits participate of the
nature of their subjects, and causes are more noble than effects, the
ancient philosophy must undoubtedly be more elevated than the modern.
Again, the object of the Pythagorean and Platonic philosophy was to
make its possessors wise and virtuous; and to elevate them above the
common frailties and imperfections of degraded humanity; and this end
was happily accomplished in its votaries, as their lives abundantly
evince: but the object of modern philosophy, is a promotion of the
conveniencies and refinements of life, by enlarging the boundaries
of traffic; and the Mathematical Sciences are studied solely with a
view to this enlargement. The design of the ancient philosophy was
to remove the causes of wonder, by contemplating effects in their
causes: the grand object of the modern, is to increase admiration, by
attempting to investigate causes through the infinity of particular
effects. So that philosophy, as Mr. Harris justly observes, now
ends where it formerly began. For either there is no such thing as
science, or if its existence be admitted, it can never be obtained by
experimental enquiries; as these must be liable to all the inaccuracy
and imperfection of their material subjects.
In short, the philosophy of Pythagoras and Plato will be found, when
impartially considered, to contain every thing which can enlighten the
mind, improve the morals, and exalt the character of man. It is built
on the steady basis of truth, and will survive the wreck of ages. Its
foundation is deep, and its summit reaches the heavens. It is a mighty
rock, which modern systems _may_ assail, like a raging sea; but,
like stormy waves, they will only be broken about its impenetrable
sides. To war against wisdom is folly; for opposition in this case is
the destruction of its author. The moderns may, indeed, expect, because
their merit is raised by the present age, above that of the ancients,
to appear as giants in the eyes of posterity; but they will only verify
the elegant observation of the poet[4], that
Pygmies are Pygmies still, though perch’d on Alps,
And Pyramids are Pyramids in vales.
A