The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elements — Plato — John Shaqi
The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elements
Plato · en
In order to this, I shall endeavour to prove the following position,
that things valuable for their own sakes, are preferable to such as
refer to something else. Now, this may be demonstrated, by considering
that every natural production was made with reference to some end, as
is evident from an induction of particulars; and if this be the case,
it may be safely inferred, that every thing exists for the sake of the
end. But that for the sake of which any being subsists is the best
of all; and the end, according to nature, is that which is perfected
the last of all, from the birth of any being. Hence the human body
receives its end or perfection first, but the soul last. And hence the
soul is posterior to the body, in the accomplishment of its nature;
and its ultimate perfection is wisdom. It is on this account that old
age alone pursues and desires the goods of prudence and wisdom. Hence,
wisdom is a certain end to us according to nature; and to be wise,
is the extreme or final cause for which we were produced. It was,
therefore, beautifully said by Pythagoras, that man was constituted
by divinity, that he might know, and contemplate. If then wisdom be
the end of our nature, to be endued with wisdom must be the best of
all. So that other things are to be performed for the sake of the good
which this contains. But to enquire in every science something besides
this, and to require that it should be useful, is alone the employment
of one ignorant of the great difference between the most illustrious
goods, and things necessary. For they differ, indeed, widely; since
things are to be called necessaries, which are the objects of desire
for the sake of others, and without which it is impossible to live. But
those concerns alone are properly good, which are loved by themselves,
though nothing else should fall to the lot of their possessor; for one
thing is not to be desired for the sake of another infinitely, but it
is requisite to stop at some limited object of desire, of which it
would be ridiculous to require any utility abstracted from itself.
But you will ask, What is the emolument of contemplative wisdom, what
the good it confers on its possessor? What if we should say (for such
is the truth of the case) that it transports us by intellect and
cogitation, to regions similar to the fortunate islands; for utility
and necessity are strangers to those happy and liberal realms. And
if this be admitted, ought we not to blush, that having it in our
power to become inhabitants of the fortunate islands, we neglect the
pursuit, through a sordid enquiry after what is useful and profitable
according to vulgar estimation? The rewards of science, therefore, are
not to be reprehended, nor is it a trifling good which results from
its acquisition. Besides, as men travel to the mountain Olympus for
its spectacle alone, preferring a view of its lofty summit to much
wealth; and as many other spectacles are desired for their own sakes,