The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elements — Plato — John Shaqi
The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elements
Plato · en
But after the multitude belonging to souls, betake yourself to
intellect, and the intellectual kingdoms, that you may possess the
unity of things. There remain in contemplation of a nature ever abiding
in eternity, of life ever flourishing, intelligence ever vigilant, to
which no perfection of being is wanting, and which does not desire
the chariot of time, for the full energy of its essence. When you
have beheld natures of this exalted kind, and have seen by how great
an interval they are superior to souls; in the next place enquire
whether any multitude is there, and if intellect, since it is one, is
also universal; and again, since it is uniform, if not also multiform:
for you will find it subsists after this manner. When, therefore, you
have intimately beheld this intellectual multitude, though profoundly
indivisible and united, transport yourself again to another principle,
and having considered, as in a more exalted rank, the _unities_
of intellectual essences, in the last place proceed to unity perfectly
separate and free from all things. And when advanced thus far, lay
aside all multitude, and you will at length arrive at the ineffable
fountain of _good_. And since it appears, from these various
gradations, that the soul then properly obtains perfection, when she
flies from all external and internal multitude, and the boundless
variety of the universe, we may likewise conclude from hence, that
our souls do not alone collect their knowledge from the obscure
objects of sense, nor from things particular and divisible discover a
perfect whole, and a perfect one, but draw forth science from their
inmost recesses, and produce accuracy and perfection from whatever
in appearances is inaccurate and imperfect. For it is not proper to
suppose that things false and obscure, should be the principal sources
of knowledge to the soul; and that things discordant among themselves,
which require the reasonings and arguments of the soul, and which are
ambiguous and confused, should precede science which is immutable; nor
that things variously changed, should generate reasons abiding in one;
nor that indeterminate beings should exist as the causes of determinate
intelligence. It is not, therefore, fit to receive the truth of
eternal entities from boundless multitude; nor from sensible objects
the judgment of universals; nor from things destitute of reason,
accurate discrimination of that which is good: but it is proper that
the soul, retiring into her immortal essence, should there scrutinize
the _good_ and the _true_, and the immutable reasons of all
things: for the essence of the soul is full of these, though they are
clouded by oblivion. The soul, therefore, beholding exteriors, enquires
after truth, in the mean time possessing it in the depths of her
essence, and deserting herself, explores the good in the dark regions
of matter. Hence, every one in the pursuit of reality ought to begin
with the knowledge of himself.