The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 1 of 2) : $b translated from the Greek, to which a seventh book is added, in order to supply the deficiency of another book on this subject, which was written by Proclus, but since lost, also, a translation from the Greek of Proclus' Elements of theology, to which are added a translation of the treatise of Proclus, On providence and fate, a translation of extracts from his treatise, entitled, Ten doubts concerning — Plato — John Shaqi
The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 1 of 2) : $b translated from the Greek, to which a seventh book is added, in order to supply the deficiency of another book on this subject, which was written by Proclus, but since lost, also, a translation from the Greek of Proclus' Elements of theology, to which are added a translation of the treatise of Proclus, On providence and fate, a translation of extracts from his treatise, entitled, Ten doubts concerning
Plato · en
out of the body, so in the veins of the earth, metals, and fossils,
and a rainy vapour are generated.”[13] And in cap. 7, p. 162, after
having shown that there is in the earth the sense of touching, that it
respires, and is subject in certain parts to languors, and internal
vicissitudes of the viscera, and that subterranean heat proceeds from
the soul of the earth, he adds, “That a certain image of the zodiac is
resplendent in this soul, and therefore of the whole firmament, and is
the bond of the sympathy of things celestial and terrestrial.”[14]
Bishop Berkeley also was by no means hostile to this opinion, that the
world is one great animal, as is evident from the following extract
from his Siris, (p. 131).
“Blind fate and blind chance are at bottom much the same thing, and
one no more intelligible then the other. Such is the mutual relation,
connection, motion, and sympathy of the parts of this world, that they
seem, as it were, animated and held together by one soul: and such
is their harmony, order, and regular course, as shows the soul to be
governed and directed by a mind. It was an opinion of remote antiquity
that the world was an animal. If we may trust the Hermaic writings,
the Ægyptians thought all things did partake of life. This opinion was
also so general and current among the Greeks, that Plutarch asserts
all others held the world to be an animal, and governed by providence,
except Leucippus, Democritus, and Epicurus. And although an animal
containing all bodies within itself, could not be touched or sensibly
affected from without; yet it is plain they attributed to it an inward
sense and feeling, as well as appetites and aversions; and that from
all the various tones, actions, and passions of the universe, they
supposed one symphony, one animal act and life to result.
“Iamblichus declares the world to be one animal, in which the
parts, however distant each from other, are nevertheless related
and connected by one common nature. And he teaches, what is also
a received notion of the Pythagoreans and Platonics, that there is
no chasm in nature, but a chain or scale of beings rising by gentle
uninterrupted gradations from the lowest to the highest, each nature
being informed and perfected by the participation of a higher. As air
becomes igneous, so the purest fire becomes animal, and the animal soul
becomes intellectual, which is to be understood, not of the change of
one nature into another, but of the connection of different natures,
each lower nature being, according to those philosophers, as it were, a
receptacle or subject for the next above it to reside and act in.