The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 1 of 2) : $b translated from the Greek, to which a seventh book is added, in order to supply the deficiency of another book on this subject, which was written by Proclus, but since lost, also, a translation from the Greek of Proclus' Elements of theology, to which are added a translation of the treatise of Proclus, On providence and fate, a translation of extracts from his treatise, entitled, Ten doubts concerning
Plato · en
But if that which is first is something which is not essence, it is
absurd to assert that it is subordinate to essence. For the principle
is that which has the greatest power and the most absolute authority,
and is most sufficient to itself, and is not that which is most
ignoble, and indigent of the many. And, in short, it is necessary that
no secondary nature should be better than the principle; for it is
requisite that beings should not be governed badly. But if, indeed, the
principle has an order subordinate to the things which proceed from
it, and the things proceeding from it are better than it, all things
will be badly confounded, nor will the principle according to nature
be any thing else than something which is not the most excellent of
things, nor will things which proceed from the principle possess from
it a power of ruling over their principle. The principle of beings,
therefore, will indeed be fortuitous, and also the beings which are
its progeny. But this is impossible. For things which are fortuitous
(if to have a fortuitous subsistence is this, not to exist according
to intellect, nor with a view to a definite end) are disorderly,
infinite, and indefinite, and are all of them things which have a less
frequency of subsistence. But the principle is invariably principle,
and other things proceed from it. If however, that which is not essence
is better than all essence, it will either be participated by it, or
it will be entirely imparticipable. If, however, essence participates
of the principle, of what will it be the principle? And how will it be
the principle of all beings? For it is necessary that the principle of
beings should be no one of beings; since if it were any one of them,
it is necessarily not the principle of all beings. But every thing
which is participated by another thing is said to be that by which it
is participated, and in which it primarily is. The principle, however,
is separate, and belongs in a greater degree to itself than to other
things. Besides, every thing which is participated proceeds from
another more excellent cause; since that which is imparticipable is
better than that which is participable. It is not, however, possible
to conceive any thing better than that which is most excellent, and
which we call the principle. For it is not lawful to assert that things
secondary to the principle, and which proceed from it, are in any
respect better than their principle. The cause therefore of all beings
is above all essence, is separate from every essence, and is neither
essence, nor has essence as an addition to its nature. For such an
addition as this is a diminution of simplicity, and of that which is
one.
CHAPTER III.