The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 1 of 2) : $b translated from the Greek, to which a seventh book is added, in order to supply the deficiency of another book on this subject, which was written by Proclus, but since lost, also, a translation from the Greek of Proclus' Elements of theology, to which are added a translation of the treatise of Proclus, On providence and fate, a translation of extracts from his treatise, entitled, Ten doubts concerning
Plato · en
It is necessary therefore, from the before-mentioned axioms, since
there is one unity the principle of the whole of things, and from which
every hyparxis derives its subsistence, that this unity should produce
from itself, prior to all other things, a multitude characterized
by unity, and a number most allied to its cause. For if every other
cause constitutes a progeny similar to itself prior to that which is
dissimilar, much more must _the one_ unfold into light after this
manner things posterior to itself, since it is beyond similitude,
and _the one itself_ must produce according to _union_ things which
primarily proceed from it. For how can _the one_ give subsistence to
its progeny except unically? For nature generates things secondary to
itself physically, soul psychically, and intellect intellectually.
_The one_ therefore is the cause of the whole of things according to
union, and the progression from _the one_ is uniform. But if that which
primarily produces all things is _the one_, and the progression from it
is unical, it is certainly necessary that the multitude thence produced
should be self-perfect unities, most allied to their producing cause.
Farther still, if every monad constitutes a number adapted to itself,
as was before demonstrated, by a much greater priority must _the one_
generate a number of this kind. For in the progression of things, that
which is produced is frequently dissimilar to its producing cause,
through the dominion of difference: for such are the last of things,
and which are far distant from their proper principles. But the first
number, and which is connascent with _the one_, is uniform, ineffable,
superessential, and perfectly similar to its cause. For in the first
causes, neither does difference intervening separate from the generator
the things begotten, and transfer them into another order, nor does
the motion of the cause effecting a remission of power, produce into
dissimilitude and indefiniteness the generation of the whole of things;
but the cause of all things being unically raised above all motion and
division, has established about itself a divine number, and has united
it to its own simplicity. _The one_ therefore prior to beings has given
subsistence to the unities of beings.