The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 1 of 2) : $b translated from the Greek, to which a seventh book is added, in order to supply the deficiency of another book on this subject, which was written by Proclus, but since lost, also, a translation from the Greek of Proclus' Elements of theology, to which are added a translation of the treatise of Proclus, On providence and fate, a translation of extracts from his treatise, entitled, Ten doubts concerning
Plato · en
In the next place, we must speak of the triad, which is consubsistent
with this mixture. For every mixture, if it is rightly made, as
Socrates says, requires these three things, beauty, truth, and
symmetry. For neither will any thing base, if it is introduced into
the mixture, impart rectitude, since it will be the cause of error,
and of inordinate prerogative, nor if truth is at any time separated,
will it suffer the mixture to consist of things that are pure, and
which are in reality subdued, but it will fill the whole with an image
and with non-being. Nor without symmetry will there be a communion
of the elements, and an elegant association. Symmetry, therefore,
is necessary to the union of the things that are mingled, and to an
appropriate communion. But truth is necessary to purity. And beauty to
order; which also renders the whole lovely. For when each thing in the
mixture has a place adapted to itself, it renders both the elements,
and the arrangement resulting from them, beautiful. Here therefore, in
the first mixture, these three things are apparent, symmetry, truth,
and beauty. And symmetry indeed is the cause to the mixture, that being
is one; truth is the cause of the reality of its existence; and beauty
is the cause of its being intelligible. Hence it is intelligible and
truly being. That also which is primarily being is more uniform, and
intellect is conjoined to it, according to its familiarity with the
beautiful. But each participates of existence, because it is being
derived from being. That which is mixed however, is supreme among
beings, because it is united to _the good_. And it appears to me,
that the divine Iamblichus perceiving these three causes of being,
defines the intelligible in these three, viz. in symmetry, truth, and
beauty, and unfolds the intelligible Gods through these in the Platonic
theology. In what manner indeed, the intelligible breadth consists
of these, will be most evident as we proceed. Now however, from what
has been said, it is perfectly manifest why Socrates says that this
triad is found to be in the vestibules of the good. For that which
is primarily being participates of this triad through its union with
_the good_. For because indeed _the good_ is the measure of
all beings, the first being becomes itself commensurate. Because the
former is prior to being, the latter subsists truly and really. And
because the former is good and desirable, the latter presents itself
to the view as the beautiful itself. Here therefore, the first beauty
also subsists; and on this account _the one_ is not only the cause
of good, but likewise of beauty, as Plato says in his Epistles. Beauty
however subsists here occultly, since this order comprehends all things
uniformly, in consequence of subsisting primarily from the principles
[bound and infinity]. But where and how beauty is unfolded into light,
we shall shortly explain.
CHAPTER XII.