The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 1 of 2) : $b translated from the Greek, to which a seventh book is added, in order to supply the deficiency of another book on this subject, which was written by Proclus, but since lost, also, a translation from the Greek of Proclus' Elements of theology, to which are added a translation of the treatise of Proclus, On providence and fate, a translation of extracts from his treatise, entitled, Ten doubts concerning
Plato · en
But the second triad after this, Plato denominates in the Timæus
indeed, eternity; but in the Parmenides the first wholeness. How these,
however, are allotted the same peculiarity we may learn by considering
that every thing eternal is indeed a whole; viz. if it is perfectly
eternal, and has the whole of its essence and energy at once present.
For every intellect is a thing of this kind, perfectly establishing at
once in itself, the whole of intellectual perception. It likewise does
not possess one part of being, but is deprived of another part, nor
does it partially participate of energy, but it summarily comprehends
the whole of being, and the whole of intelligence. If, however, in its
energies it proceeded according to time, but had an eternal essence, it
would be allotted the whole of the latter, and this always stably the
same, but would possess the former variably, so as to exert different
energies at different times. Eternity, therefore, is every where the
cause of wholeness to the natures to which it is primarily present. But
whole also is every where comprehensive of perpetuity. For no whole
abandons either its essence or its proper perfection; but that which
is primarily corrupted and vitiated is a partial nature. For on this
account also the whole world is perpetual, viz. because it is a whole,
and this is likewise the case with all that the heavens contain, and
with each of the elements. For every where wholeness is connective of
subjects. Hence eternity is consubsistent with wholeness, and whole
and eternity are the same. Each also is a measure, the one of things
eternal, and of all perpetual natures, but the other of parts and of
all multitude. Since, however, there are three wholenesses, one indeed
being prior to parts, another subsisting from parts, and another in
a part,--through the wholeness which is prior to parts, eternity
measures those unities of divine natures which are exempt from beings;
but through the wholeness which derives its subsistence from parts,
it measures the unities that are coordinate with beings; and through
the wholeness which is in a part, it measures all beings and whole
essences. For these wholenesses being parts of the divine unities, they
possess partibly what preexists unically in the unities. And, moreover,
eternity is nothing else than the ever shining forth from the unity
which is connected with being. But whole consists of two parts, viz. of
_the one_ and being, power existing as the collector of the parts.
According to both these conceptions, therefore, the duad pertaining to
the middle intelligible triad, unfolds the uniform an occult hypostasis
of the first triad.