The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 1 of 2) : $b translated from the Greek, to which a seventh book is added, in order to supply the deficiency of another book on this subject, which was written by Proclus, but since lost, also, a translation from the Greek of Proclus' Elements of theology, to which are added a translation of the treatise of Proclus, On providence and fate, a translation of extracts from his treatise, entitled, Ten doubts concerning — Plato — John Shaqi
The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 1 of 2) : $b translated from the Greek, to which a seventh book is added, in order to supply the deficiency of another book on this subject, which was written by Proclus, but since lost, also, a translation from the Greek of Proclus' Elements of theology, to which are added a translation of the treatise of Proclus, On providence and fate, a translation of extracts from his treatise, entitled, Ten doubts concerning
Plato · en
If you are willing however from what is written in the Cratylus,
to see the peculiarity of this order, in the first place, let this
be considered by you as an argument of the _Synoche_ established
in the middle, that a twofold habitude of it is delivered, one,
towards intelligibles, but the other towards intellectuals. For it
is said to see the things above, and to generate a pure intellect.
Hence, of intelligibles it is the intelligence, but of intellectuals
the intelligible. For the cause of intellect subsists prior to
an intellectual cause, and that which is at once both these,
especially gives completion to the middle order of intelligibles and
intellectuals. For the collective deity, perceiving intelligibles, or
rather being united to them, does not primarily give subsistence to a
divine intellect. And the perfective deity, producing together with the
middle divinity intellectuals, proximately perceives intellectually the
celestial order, and not the intelligibles prior to the heaven. But
the middle divinity alone, occupying the intelligible and intellectual
centre, equally indeed extends to both, but perceiving intelligibles
intellectually, it is the cause of intellectuals intelligibly.
Since however, habitude to its causes precedes the power[231] in it
which is generative of intellectuals, Socrates beginning from this
habitude, delivers also a second power as suspended from it. But sight
directed to things above is very properly assigned the appellation of
_celestial_, as _seeing the things above_. This therefore, perfectly
defines for us a habitude more ancient than the connectedly-containing
order, jointly assuming it to be intellectual as with reference to
intelligibles, and sight as with reference to the objects of sight,
though it intellectually perceives itself, and is intelligible in
itself. But the intelligible of it, as with reference to that which is
primarily intelligible, is allotted an intellectual order. What follows
however, unfolds the habitude of this middle to intellectuals. (For
Socrates adds,) “Whence also, O Hermogenes, those who are conversant
with things on high say that Heaven generates a pure intellect, and
that this name is properly assigned to it.” The order therefore,
of the Heaven is expanded as a middle in the middle intellectual
and intelligible Gods, comprehending at once the intelligible and
intellectual in one impartible connexion, subsisting similarly with
respect to each of these, and being equally distant from the first
intellectuals, and the unical intelligibles. Hence it is said to
perceive intellectually the things above, and thus to produce (a pure)
intellect.