The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 2 of 2) : $b translated from the Greek, to which a seventh book is added, in order to supply the deficiency of another book on this subject, which was written by Proclus, but since lost, also, a translation from the Greek of Proclus' Elements of theology, to which are added a translation of the treatise of Proclus, On providence and fate, a translation of extracts from his treatise, entitled, Ten doubts concerning p
Plato · en
If, however, the second demiurgi have such a nature as this, nothing
evil or preternatural is generated from the celestial Gods; nor is
it proper to divide the Gods in the heavens after this manner, as
many do, viz. into the beneficent and malignant; for being Gods this
is impossible. But the mortal animal is the cause of evil to itself.
For neither disease, nor poverty,[94] nor any thing else of this kind
is evil; but the depravity of the soul, intemperance, timidity, and
every vice. Of these things, however, we are the causes to ourselves.
For though being impelled by others to these vices we are badly
affected, yet again it is through ourselves; since we have the power
of associating with the good, and separating ourselves from the bad.
According to Plato, therefore, we must not think that of the Gods some
are malignant and others beneficent, but we must admit that all of
them are the sources to mortals of all the good which they are able to
receive; and that things which are truly evils are not produced, but
are only signified by them, as we have before observed. For they extend
terrific appearances and signs to those who are able to see and read
the letters in the universe, which the framers of mortal natures during
their revolutions write by their configurations. And though some one
should derive a certain evil from the motions of the celestial Gods,
so as to become timid or intemperate, yet they operate in one way, and
their influences are participated by souls in another. For the efflux
of intellect, says Plotinus, becomes craft in him who receives the
efflux badly; the gift of an elegant life becomes intemperance through
a similar cause; and in short, while they produce beneficently, their
gifts are participated by terrestrial natures, after a contrary manner.
Hence the givers who bestow beneficently are not to be accused as the
authors of evil, but the recipients who pervert their gifts by their
own inaptitudes. Thus also Jupiter in Homer blames souls as in vain
accusing the Gods, while they themselves are the causes of evils. For
the Gods are the sources of good, and the suppliers of intellect and
life, but are not the causes of any evil; since even a partial nature
is not the cause of evil to its offspring. What, therefore, ought we
to think concerning the Gods themselves? Is it not, that they are much
more the causes of good to their productions; since with them there
is power, with them there is a self-perfect nature, with them there
is universal goodness, to all which evil is contrary. For in its own
nature it is powerless, imperfect, and without measure.