The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 2 of 2) : $b translated from the Greek, to which a seventh book is added, in order to supply the deficiency of another book on this subject, which was written by Proclus, but since lost, also, a translation from the Greek of Proclus' Elements of theology, to which are added a translation of the treatise of Proclus, On providence and fate, a translation of extracts from his treatise, entitled, Ten doubts concerning p
Plato · en
To this also we may add, that the Demiurgus produced these two elements
the first, earth and fire; but the others for the sake of these, in
order that they might have the ratio of bonds with respect to them. And
that the four elements are both in the heavens, and in the sublunary
region; but in the former, indeed, according to a fiery characteristic,
since fire there predominates, as Plato says, but in the latter
according to a terrestrial peculiarity. For the profundity of air, and
the bulk of water are spread round the earth, and possess much of an
earthly property, on which account they are in their own nature dark.
In the heavens, therefore, there is a predominance of fire, but in the
sublunary region of earth. Since, however, generation is connascently
conjoined with the heavens, the end of the latter is earth, so far
as earth is in the heavens, but the beginning of generation is fire,
considered as subsisting in generation. For it is usual to call the
moon earth, as having the same ratio to the sun, which earth has to
fire. “But [the Demiurgus] says Orpheus, fabricated another infinite
earth, which the immortals call _Selene_, but terrestrials
_Mene_.” And it is usual to denominate the summit of generation
fire, which Aristotle also does, when he calls ether fire. In another
place, however, he does not think it proper to call ether fire, but
fiery-formed. Hence, the end of the heavens is not entirely destitute
of mutation, in consequence of its propinquity to generation; but the
beginning of generation is moved in a circle imitating the heavens.
Farther still, this likewise must be considered, that we ought not
to judge of the dignity of things from places, but from powers and
essence. By what peculiarities, therefore, are we to form a judgment
of transcendencies? By what others than those which the divine orders
exhibit? For transcendency truly so called is with the Gods. From
the divine orders, therefore, we must assume _the monadic_, _the
stable_, _the all-perfect_, _the prolific_, _the connective_, _the
perfective_, _the every-way extended_, _the vivific_, _the adorning_,
_the assimilative_, and _the comprehending_ power. For these are the
peculiarities of all the divine orders. According to all these however,
the earth surpasses the other elements, so that she may justly be
called the most ancient, and the first of the Gods.