The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 2 of 2) : $b translated from the Greek, to which a seventh book is added, in order to supply the deficiency of another book on this subject, which was written by Proclus, but since lost, also, a translation from the Greek of Proclus' Elements of theology, to which are added a translation of the treatise of Proclus, On providence and fate, a translation of extracts from his treatise, entitled, Ten doubts concerning p
Plato · en
more difficult, because we cannot collect any thing about them from
apparent objects, but it alone requires a divinely-inspired energy, and
intellectual projection. And thus much concerning this doubt.
Again, though we have assigned a reason why Plato calls the sublunary
Gods dæmons, we may likewise say according to another conception,
that in the celestial regions there are dæmons, and in the sublunary,
Gods; but that in the former the genus is indeed divine,[128] though
dæmons also are generated according to it;[129] and that in the
latter the whole multitude are dæmons. For there indeed, the divine
peculiarity, but here the dæmoniacal predominates, to which some alone
looking, have divided the divine and the dæmoniacal, according to the
heavens and generation. They ought however, to have arranged both in
both; but in the former indeed the divine nature, and in the latter
the dæmoniacal predominates; though in the former there is also the
divine peculiarity. For if the whole world is a blessed God, no one of
the parts which give completion to it is destitute of divinity, and
providential inspection. But if all things participate of deity and
providence, the world is allotted a divine nature. And if this be the
case, appropriate orders of Gods preside over its different parts. For
if the heavens through souls and intellects as media participate of
one soul, and one intellect, what ought we to think of these sublunary
elements? How is it possible, that these should not in a much greater
degree participate through certain middle divine orders, of the one
deity of the world?
Farther still, it would also be absurd that the telestic art (or the
art pertaining to mystic ceremonies) should establish on the earth
places fitted for oracles, and statues of the Gods, and through certain
symbols should cause things generated from a partial and corruptible
matter, to become adapted to the participation of deity, to be moved by
him, and to predict future events; but that the demiurgus of wholes,
should not place over the whole elements which are the incorruptible
plenitudes of the world, divine souls, intellects and Gods. For
whether was he unwilling? But how could he be unwilling, since he
wished to make all things similar to himself? Was he then unable? But
what could hinder him? For we see that this is possible from telestic
works. But if he was both willing and able, it is evident that he gave
subsistence to Gods, who have allotments in, and are the inspective
guardians of generation. Since however the genus of dæmons is every
where an attendant on the Gods, there are also dæmons who are the
fabricators of generation; some of whom indeed rule over the whole
elements, but others are the guardians of climates, others are the
rulers of nations, others of cities, others of certain families, and
others are the guardians of individuals. For the guardianship of dæmons
extends as far as to the most extreme division.