The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 2 of 2) : $b translated from the Greek, to which a seventh book is added, in order to supply the deficiency of another book on this subject, which was written by Proclus, but since lost, also, a translation from the Greek of Proclus' Elements of theology, to which are added a translation of the treatise of Proclus, On providence and fate, a translation of extracts from his treatise, entitled, Ten doubts concerning p
Plato · en
Let us, therefore, now return to the words of Plato. In the first place
then he says that Ocean and Tethys were the progeny of Heaven and
Earth. And here we may observe, that as this whole world is ample and
various, as adumbrating the intellectual order of forms, it contains
these two extremities in itself, Earth and Heaven; the latter having
the relation of a father, but the former of a mother. On this account
Plato calls Earth the most ancient of the Gods within the heavens, in
order that conformably to this he might say, that Earth is the mother
of all that Heaven is the father; at the same time evincing that
partial causes are not only subordinate to their progeny, as Poverty,
in the Banquet of Plato to Love, but are likewise superior to them, as
alone receiving the offspring proceeding from the fathers. These two
extremities, therefore, must be conceived in the world, Heaven as the
father, and Earth as the mother of her common progeny. For all the rest
terminate in these, some giving completion to the celestial number,
but others to the wholeness of Earth. After the same manner, likewise,
in each of the elements of the world, these two principles, Heaven
and Earth, must be admitted, subsisting aerially indeed in air, but
aquatically in water, and terrestrially in earth; and according to all
the above-mentioned modes; in order that each may be a perfect world,
adorned and distributed from analogous[138] principles. For if man is
said to be a microcosm, is it not necessary that each of the elements
by a much greater priority should contain in itself appropriately all
that the world contains totally? Hence, it appears to me that Plato
immediately after speaking about Heaven and Earth, delivers the theory
of these Gods, beginning from those two divinities; for the other
divinities proceed analogous to Heaven and Earth. These two divinities,
however, are totally the causes of all the Gods that are now produced.
And these divinities that are the progeny of Heaven and Earth, are
analogous to the whole of each. These two, likewise, as we have before
observed, are in each of the elements, aerially, or aquatically, or
terrestrially. For Heaven is in Earth, and Earth in Heaven.[139]
And here, indeed, Heaven subsists terrestrially, but there Earth
celestially. For Orpheus calls the moon celestial earth.[140] Nor is it
proper to wonder that this should be the case. For we may survey the
same things every where, according to the analogous, in intelligibles,
in intellectuals, in the supermundane order, in the heavens, and in
generation, conformably to the proper order of each.