The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 2 of 2) : $b translated from the Greek, to which a seventh book is added, in order to supply the deficiency of another book on this subject, which was written by Proclus, but since lost, also, a translation from the Greek of Proclus' Elements of theology, to which are added a translation of the treatise of Proclus, On providence and fate, a translation of extracts from his treatise, entitled, Ten doubts concerning p
Plato · en
Since, however, these differ according to their intellectual causes, in
the same manner as the before-mentioned orders; but in them Ocean and
Tethys were said to be the brethren, and not the fathers[149] of Saturn
and Rhea; for the progression to these was from Heaven and Earth, and
all the Titannic order is thence derived; let us see on what account
Plato here gives subsistence to Phorcys, Saturn and Rhea, from Ocean
and Tethys. For he may appear to say this not conformably to the Orphic
principles. For “Earth latently bore from Heaven, as the theologist
says, seven pure beautiful virgins with rolling eyes, and seven sons
that were kings, with fine long hair. And the daughters indeed were
Themis, and the joyful Tethys, Mnemosyne with thick-curled hair, and
the blessed Thea. She likewise bore Dione having a very-graceful form,
and Phœbe, and Rhea the mother of king Jupiter. But the venerable
Earth brought forth those celestial youths, who are called by the
appellation of Titans, because they revenged the mighty starry Heaven.
And she also bore Cæus, the great Cræus, and the strong Phorcys, and
likewise Saturn, and Ocean, Hyperion and Japetus.” These things then
having been written by the theologist prior to Plato, how is it that
Timæus produces Saturn and Rhea, from Ocean and Tethys? In answer to
this, as we have before arranged Ocean and Tethys above Saturn and
Rhea, as being the media between these and the fathers, and guardians
of the boundaries of both, as it is usual to celebrate them; we must
say in the first place, indeed, that it is not wonderful that the same
divinities should be brothers, and yet through transcendency of dignity
should be called the fathers of certain Gods. For such things as are
first, when they proceed from their causes, produce in conjunction
with those causes, the natures posterior to themselves. Thus all souls
indeed are sisters, according to one demiurgic cause, and according to
the vivific principle and fountain from which they proceed; at the same
time divine souls produce partial souls together with the demiurgus
and vivific causes, in consequence of first proceeding into light,
and abiding in their wholeness, receiving the power of fabricating
natures similar to themselves. Besides, in the Gods themselves, all the
offspring of Saturn are brethren, according to the one generative monad
by which they were produced; yet at the same time Jupiter is called
father, in the divine poet Homer, both by Juno and Neptune. So that it
is not at all wonderful, if Ocean and Tethys are called both brethren
and fathers of Saturn and Rhea; in consequence of preserving as among
brethren the paternal peculiarity. In the first place, therefore, the
doubt may after this manner be solved.